My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/07/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council - 11/07/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:21:07 PM
Creation date
6/1/2012 11:49:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/07/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUDs in shoreline areas, transfer development rights, and how to entice developers to choose <br />cluster development. <br />Councilmember Backous agreed with concerns relating to property rights but indicated he likes <br />to hear all viewpoints and information. He felt the Council cannot make good decision without it <br />and was willing to let experts advise the Council, noting the Council always states rationale for <br />its decisions. <br />Mayor Ramsey felt the issue with density credits is that no one takes into consideration the <br />resident's reason for moving to Ramsey, large lot development. He did not think residents <br />would support cluster development and he would argue the fact that a smaller lot will not bring <br />more money than a larger lot. <br />Councilmember Strommen noted she moved to a smaller lot than she had in Ostego and asked <br />why the Council approved an apartment building if all residents want a large lot. <br />Mayor Ramsey explained development is being done to put density here so residents can still <br />have their large lots. He noted that making the Hunt property preserve 30% for open space is not <br />consistent with what is in outer Ramsey. <br />Councilmember Strommen stated she hopes someone will move here to live in an apartment. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated this is the "backbone" for the entire development of the City and <br />the Council is now on board with growth. He noted the Comprehensive Plan anticipates areas of <br />growth with different density and he has seen, many times, where density is put in several areas <br />with large green space that could never have been afforded otherwise. He felt having more tools <br />was a benefit but the Council will decide whether to move forward with any of the <br />recommendations. <br />Ms. Coleman explained that Rice County was dealing with "4 in 40" and the benefit was to get <br />an additional two units. <br />Mayor Ramsey commented that when you create that green space, people want it to be a park. <br />However, with large lot development, people recreate on their own property and there is no need <br />for a park. <br />Councilmember Elvig pointed out there is an evolution with parks because he had created a <br />"park" on his own land but then trails opened so now his kids can get to parks to play with others <br />on those fields. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated while he was reluctant to support this request, if it is simply to compile <br />data and use the EPB, not staff time, he would not put up a fuss. <br />Councilmember Tossey stated before he would consider this request he wants to see what <br />students have done with other government entities. He remained very cautious and concerned. <br />City Council Work Session / October 18, 2011 <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.