My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/07/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council - 11/07/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:21:07 PM
Creation date
6/1/2012 11:49:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/07/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Wise noted it has been discussed to use assessments for overlay projects and this <br />fund for reconstruction projects but sometimes there is reconstruction with an overlay project. <br />He asked whether all properties get assessed, even churches. <br />Public Works Director Olson explained that churches get assessed but if a road project is funded <br />from the property tax levy, churches do not pay taxes. He explained that is fortunate for those <br />with a 2.5 acre lot but not fortunate for property owners with reconstruction projects because <br />even if the City paid 20-40% of the cost, the assessment could still be $15,000. He noted if the <br />counter petition is 75%, they may still petition against the project because of the high cost. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated this needs to be considered because that is why people moved to Ramsey, <br />they wanted large lots and now they will have to pay for it. <br />Councilmember McGlone noted the City is not considering curb and gutter, concrete apron, or <br />sidewalks, so there may be more issues that a group could ferret out. <br />Public Works Director Olson stated it appears the communication plan as presented is not what <br />the Council intended and the Council has indicated having no on-line survey. <br />Councilmember Wise asked if the survey could be published so when residents come to the <br />meeting they can fill it out. That process would assure the education process occurs. <br />Councilmember Strommen noted the on-line survey could require inclusion of their name and <br />address. She stated it is sometimes hard for people to get to meetings and she does not want to <br />discourage input. She questioned whether the Council needed to weigh everything equally and <br />agreed more quality discussion is better because of the benefit of residents interacting with one <br />another. Councilmember Strommen noted that interaction may result in someone changing their <br />mind. <br />Councilmember Elvig agreed that you can't trust input if responding to a "yes/no" internet <br />survey without being educated as to the issue. He thought offering options of a comment card, <br />requesting more information, or being alerted of upcoming events may be of benefit because it <br />will engage residents and reach out to them. <br />Mayor Ramsey suggested the Council and staff make a video at QCTV with a brief script that <br />can be placed on line. <br />The Council agreed with this suggestion and that Mayor Ramsey, Councilmember McGlone, and <br />City Administrator Ulrich will undertake this endeavor. <br />Councilmember Strommen suggested staff use the chart during open houses and that information <br />be included on the invitation post card so residents become interested in attending the meeting. <br />The Council discussed the range of methods to fund street reconstruction projects including a tax <br />increase, assessments, franchise fees, or a combination of assessments and a lower franchise fee. <br />It was mentioned that the assessment process is costly and adds expense and acknowledged there <br />City Council Work Session / October 18, 2011 <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.