Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session 6. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 06/12/2012 <br />Submitted For: Kurt Ulrich By: Bill Goodrich, Administrative Services <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Public Hearing to Consider introducing an Ordinance Amending Chapter 8 (Public Improvements and Special <br />Assessments) of the City Charter as recommended by the Charter Commission. <br />Background: <br />On April 19, 2012, the Charter Commission recommended amending Chapter 8 of the City Charter (Public <br />Improvements and Special Assessments) relating to the process for petitioning for a Local Improvement. <br />Currently pursuant to State Statute, if 35% or more of the affected property owners petition for a Local <br />Improvement, the project can be approved by a 3/5ths vote of the City Council. If the percent of affected property <br />owners petitioning is less than 35% or no petition is presented then the Local Improvement can only be ordered by <br />a super majority or a 4/5ths vote of the City Council. <br />The Charter Commission has recommended that the City Charter be amended to increase the 35% affected property <br />owners petition requirement to 50% of the affected property owners. City staff advised the Charter Commission that <br />the merits to changing to a higher percent is that the larger number of required initial petitioners will reduce the <br />chance of a petition against a project after time and money have been expended for feasibility studies, public <br />hearing etc. all required to move the project forward. This would be more efficient and more cost effective on the <br />front end but still allow the project to be petitioned against as permitted by Section 8.4.3 of the Charter. Said section <br />is titled "Petition against the Local Improvement" and permits a proposed petitioned for Local Improvement to be <br />stopped if a petition of affected property owners OPPOSED to the project is presented by a percent at least equal to <br />those who petitioned FOR the project. Thus if the initial petition in favor of an improvement is 50% of the affected <br />property owners, an opposing petition will also need 50% of the affected property owners to be effective to stop <br />proceedings on the Local Improvement. <br />The charter amendment process is dictated by state statute. The process before you now is per Minn. Stat. 410.12 <br />subd. 7 titled "Amendment by Ordinance " The Charter Commission may recommend an amendment to the City <br />Council, which may adopt the recommendation in the form of an ordinance The recommended ordinance cannot <br />be enacted until after the City Council has conducted a public hearing on it and it must be adopted by a unanimous <br />vote of the City Council. The public hearing has been published and is being held this evening. This procedure <br />does not require a voter election, except that the ordinance is not effective for 90 days after its passage in order to <br />allow for a referendum petition by residents which must be presented within 60 days of the ordinance's adoption by <br />the Council. Please note, historically this is the amendment process most often used in the City to amend its charter. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Charter Commission and staff recommend introducing the proposed ordinance and subsequently placing it on <br />the June 26, 2012 Agenda for formal adoption. <br />Funding Source: <br />N/A <br />Council Action: <br />Motion to introduce the Charter Commission recommended Ordinance Amending Chapter 8 (Public Improvement <br />and Special Assessment). <br />