My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 06/04/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2012
>
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 06/04/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 11:28:04 AM
Creation date
7/9/2012 10:30:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
06/04/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
saying that adding another layer of review to the development process would conflict with the <br />City Council's goal of streamlining the overall review process. <br />Board Member Bentz stated that previously they were looking at costs involved with collecting <br />rainwater that is deterred from the sewer. <br />Associate Planner/Environmental Coordinator Anderson stated that there is a water and sewer <br />study currently underway, which is showing that certain fees may be reduced to a degree. He <br />stated that their goal is to reduce development fees where possible. <br />Board Member Valentine stated that developers he has spoken with find it appealing to develop <br />in a green method. He asked if the city has a way to promote this with developers to attract <br />them. <br />Associate Planner /Environmental Coordinator Anderson stated that Allina made selections of <br />what level they wanted to participate in green construction. He stated that the VA Clinic is <br />attempting to get LEED certified. <br />Chairperson Max stated that a developer used to serve on this Board and he stated that what <br />really helps is to make the rules clear and consistent. Chairperson Max stated that he would not <br />like to see a lot of rules and regulations added. He questioned who would police all of the <br />mandates if several are added. <br />Board Member Valentine suggested having the tools available for those who are interested. <br />Chairperson Max suggested having some standards to encourage developers but not have as a <br />mandate. <br />Associate Planner/Environmental Coordinator Anderson asked if there is a suggestion to add to <br />this topic to the work plan. <br />Board Member Valentine commented that if the development standards are the same for <br />residential and commercial there should not be a need. <br />Associate Planner/Environmental Coordinator Anderson stated that development standards are <br />not the same for instance, when a trail is being developed. <br />Board Member Bentz stated that a graded area should have maintenance requirements. He stated <br />that tall weeds should not be allowed to grow. He referred to an area across the street. <br />Associate Planner/Environmental Coordinator Anderson stated that PSD and the City <br />periodically mow down the weeds. Also, the city works with the banks who own a lot of lots in <br />some of the stalled residential developments. The banks are taking responsibility of mowing 15- <br />feet back from the curb so the lot maintains a somewhat manicured look. He reported that <br />abatements are scheduled for properties that are not adequately maintained and the cost of the <br />abatement is assessed against the property. <br />Chairperson Max suggested creating wording for the green idea. <br />Environmental Policy Board / June 4, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.