Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Wise recused himself due to a potential conflict of interest and left the Council <br />Chambers at 8:21 p.m. <br />City Attorney Goodrich reviewed the staff report and status of acquiring five parcels relating to <br />the Sunwood Drive Realignment Project. <br />City Engineer Himmer reviewed acquisition costs, noting they are higher than anticipated at $6.2 <br />million. The funding package equals $5.9 million for a funding gap of approximately $289,000. <br />He indicated that bids will be presented, once received, along with costs for street lighting and <br />consulting engineer. <br />The Council discussed the funding options and asked questions of staff. It was noted the HRA <br />will be discussing possible disbursement of land sale proceeds at tonight's meeting. <br />Finance Director Lund presented funding options based on acquisition costs of $6,232,000 <br />including legal costs and answered questions of the Council. She indicated the intention is to <br />give the funds, not loan the funds, for this purpose. <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated the Council needs to identify funding prior to ordering the <br />project, the cost of which will not be known until bids are opened. He explained project costs <br />and land sale proceeds will come together at the next meeting but staff wanted to discuss the land <br />proceed policy with the HRA tonight to identify enough funding to allow this project to move <br />forward on the anticipated schedule. <br />Councilmember Tossey expressed an unwillingness to consider use of the Equipment Revolving <br />Fund in case of equipment failure. <br />Councilmember Strommen stated she has been on board with this project; however, is growing <br />uncomfortable due to higher than anticipated costs, lower land proceeds, and loss of TOD grant <br />funding. She stated she was reluctant to consider budgeting all funds and future land proceeds to <br />this project when it has not yet been identified how those funds will be paid back. <br />The Council discussed the priority of the Sunwood Drive Realignment Project and consensus <br />was reached this was an important project and would create synergy for The COR and <br />interchange project. However, funding needed to be identified. <br />City Administrator Ulrich recommended purchasing the right -of -way if the Council thinks the <br />project will eventually be completed, noting the Oasis property has already been purchased at $1 <br />million in anticipation of this and the interchange project. He indicated the City Attorney has <br />negotiated offers and delaying purchase of right -of -way parcels may result in issues with the <br />property owner. City Administrator Ulrich stated it would not be a bad investment to purchase <br />rights -of -way even if the City has to wait to identify land proceeds to pay for the rest of the <br />project, and a funding package can be created that does not include Equipment Revolving Funds. <br />City Council / June 12, 2012 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />