Laserfiche WebLink
4.01: Review Contract for Services with ACG <br />City Administrator Ulrich presented the staff report and indicated they have relied heavily on <br />Mr. Mike Mulrooney, ACG, to assist with critical components such as business retention and <br />future business opportunities. He recommended to continue services on an hourly basis. <br />Mr. Mulrooney gave a brief summary of the projects he has worked on for the City of Ramsey <br />and his involvement with the business retention and expansion program in the City. He <br />additionally defined the retainer as a more extensive approach rather than hourly, which is <br />reacting to inquires coming into the City. Mr. Mulrooney indicated he is the follow up person <br />once a prospect comes into the City and explained currently there are six fairly solid prospects <br />but the difficulty is the City is rapidly running out of sites that can accommodate. He provided a <br />few examples of these prospects. <br />Member McGlone expressed concern of hiring a consultant without an RFP. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated he will have the budget schedule for the next work session and <br />will provide status regarding a permanent hire for 2013. He added in the interim, with things in <br />flux, a consultant is a good stopgap to have on an hourly basis. <br />Motion by Member LeTourneau, seconded by Member Williams, to recommend to City Council <br />to continue a per hour charge compensation structure for services from ACG until the monthly <br />cost of services approaches the retainer amount ($3,750 per month); at which time staff shall <br />bring back this item for EDA consideration. <br />Further discussion: Member Steffen requested City Administrator Ulrich advise when an <br />amount reaches close to the retainer in any given month. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members LeTourneau, Williams, McGlone and <br />Steffen. Voting No: None. Absent: Members Skaff and Wise. <br />4.02: EDA Budget Discussion <br />City Administrator Ulrich presented the staff report and requested input on moving some staffing <br />costs over to HRA, which would not affect staff capacity. Input is also requested on reserves. <br />He added he can bring back a more formal budget to the July meeting. <br />The consensus of the EDA was that the position should be added and filled. <br />Discussion ensued regarding what is the proper amount or target reserve. The reserve is not just <br />cash flow but operational for projects and for economic development opportunities. It was <br />suggested to have a policy to document a clear function. The recommendation was to review <br />historical reserves, annual activity, and how that compares to history as well as to balance and <br />possible future behavior. <br />Economic Development Authority /June 14, 2012 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />