Laserfiche WebLink
ASK THE AUTHOR JOIN LIS ONLINE! <br />Go online during the month of July to participate in our "Ask the <br />Author" forum, an interactive feature of Zoning Practice. Tom <br />Daniels will be available to answer questions about this article. <br />Go to the APA website at www.planning.org and follow the links to <br />the Ask the Author section. From there, justsubm it your questions <br />about the article using the e-mail link. The author will reply, and <br />Zoning Practice will post the answers cumulatively on the website <br />for the benefit of all subscribers. This feature will be available for <br />selected issues of Zoning Practice at announced times. After each <br />online discussion is closed, the answers will be saved in an online <br />archive available through the APA Zoning Practice web pages. <br />About the Author <br />Tom Daniels is a professor in the Department of City and <br />Regional Planning at the University of Pennsylvania. He teaches <br />Land -Use Planning, Environmental Planning, and Growth <br />Management. Daniels is the coauthor of the Small Town Planning <br />Handbook (APA Planners Press, 2007) and the Planners Guide to <br />CommunityViz (APA Planners Press, 2011). <br />tion of an ADU, whether detached or an <br />attached apartment, will result in higher <br />property taxes for the property owner. <br />CREATING AN ACCESSORY HOUSING <br />ORDINANCE <br />Zoning is not known as a tool that local <br />governments use to respond quickly to <br />demographic trends or changes in the real <br />estate market. The main purpose of zoning <br />remains the separation of conflicting uses, <br />which is closely tied to the protection of <br />property values. But there is a sequence of <br />steps that a local government can take to <br />create a legally and politically sound acces <br />sory housing ordinance. • <br />First, planners and elected officials <br />should make sure that the community <br />generally supports ADUs. Then they can <br />add an affordable housing goal to the <br />comprehensive plan (if such a goal does not <br />already exist). Next, planners and elected <br />officials can include a policy objective to <br />promote ADUs in the housing section of the <br />comprehensive plan and amend the future <br />land -use map to indicate where ADUs are al- <br />lowed. Planners should have a sense of the <br />maximum build -out potential for accessory <br />dwelling units, and accessory units should <br />only be allowed in areas with adequate <br />central sewer and water service. This first <br />step shows that the elected officials and <br />planners support accessory housing. <br />Second, make sure than the accessory <br />housing provisions of the zoning ordinance <br />are consistent with the local comprehensive <br />plan. The affordable housing goat and ac- <br />cessory dwelling objective give direction to <br />the zoning ordinance and establish a legal <br />basis for the accessory dwelling provisions <br />within the zoning ordinance. The location of <br />where ADUs are allowed on the zoning map <br />should coincide with locations identified as <br />appropriate on the future land -use map. The <br />overall consistency of the zoning ordinance <br />and zoning map with the affordable housing <br />goal, the accessory housing objective, and <br />the future land -use map of the comprehen- <br />sive plan will make the accessory housing <br />ordinance more likely to withstand legal <br />challenges. <br />An important decision is whether <br />to allow accessory dwellings by right or <br />through a special exception. A conditional <br />use permit makes little sense because ac- <br />cessory housing generally does not affect <br />the entire community but rather certain <br />neighborhoods. The advantage of the spe- <br />cial exception approach is that the zoning <br />ordinance can impose certain limits on the <br />number of occupants of the accessory hous- <br />ing. The special exception process involves <br />The location of where ADUs are allowed on <br />the zoning map should coincide with loca- <br />tions identified as appropriate on the future <br />land -use map. <br />Third, the addition of the accessory hous- <br />ing provisions in the zoning ordinance helps <br />to avoid rezoning and variance battles, which <br />can be expensive and engender bad feelings <br />with neighbors. In drafting the ADU ordinance, <br />planners should meet with residential prop- <br />erty owners and neighborhood associations <br />and negotiate design standards, parking, <br />and rules forADUs, such as "no more than <br />two people may reside in an accessory unit." <br />This community outreach serves to head off <br />political opposition to the accessory housing <br />ordinance and to incorporate as much as pos- <br />sible the comments of the people who will live <br />near and next to the ADUs. The ADU ordinance <br />emphasizes revising single- family zoning dis- <br />tricts to allow accessory dwellings. ADUs, both <br />detached units and attached apartments, <br />must be defined in the ordinance. <br />a review of the ADU that the home owner <br />is proposing, a fee, and approval from the <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment. <br />On the other hand, allowing an ADU <br />by -right can speed the review process while <br />maintaining certain performance standards, <br />such as a required tie -in to central sewer <br />and water, limits on size, and number of <br />residents. A site plan review is commonly <br />required whether the zoning to allow ac- <br />cessory dwellings is by -right or by special <br />exception. <br />Fourth, land development and building <br />design standards are key issues, especially <br />for detached units. Setbacks from prop- <br />erty lines are usually stated in the zoning <br />ordinance rather than left up to the variance <br />process. For the sake of good neighbor rela- <br />tions and appearance, a specific setback of <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 7.12 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Ipage 3 <br />