My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/19/2012 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/19/2012 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:35:13 PM
Creation date
8/14/2012 2:48:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special
Document Date
06/19/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Field asked about cattails in the pond. It was noted depth would prevent cattails. <br />He also questioned the elevation of backyards to the pond and if this has been addressed. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy expressed concern regarding the maximum depth. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated they could modify plans to a maximum six foot depth. <br />The Commission asked Senior Planner Gladhill for his recommendation who stated he would <br />like to get feedback from the engineering department but believes a six -foot depth would work. <br />Commissioner Schiller questioned the water level throughout the year. <br />Development Manager Lazan discussed input to the pond from adjacent street and yard storm <br />water and from ground water. <br />Commissioner Schiller questioned dropping it down to six feet. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy questioned what are the normal level or depth and the amount of <br />variation. It was noted it is the amount to the point of overflow. The wetland elevation was <br />explained. <br />Chairperson Levine questioned being down ten feet versus six feet. It was noted you need a <br />certain volume of water below the water level. <br />Development Manager Lazan noted they can go to six feet. The majority of quality treatment <br />will be done in the ponds elsewhere in The COR so this is additional treatment. But, they need <br />the dirt to build the paths, although could make it up elsewhere. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy noted he wanted to ensure engineering, HRA and the public has <br />reviewed what is reasonable — water quality, cost of fill and safety concerns. He expressed <br />concern with a ten -foot depth. He requested another review to ensure safety at ten feet. <br />Commissioner Field also questioned the depth but indicated if the down slope is efficient to <br />provide exit points, it would be fine. He favored ten feet but questioned winter and ice freezing <br />over the pond. <br />Development Manager Lazan noted Commission's concern but stated these are generally <br />accepted practices. <br />Commissioner Perez stated having more depth would be better in the long run and when there are <br />dry seasons it won't fill. <br />Motion by Commissioner Field, seconded by Commissioner Schiller, to recommend that City <br />Council approve the Preliminary Plat and the Zoning Amendment from COR -5 to COR -4a <br />contingent upon the following criteria: <br />Planning Commission /June 19, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.