|
Jurisdiction
<br />Population
<br />Land area
<br />(in square miles)
<br />Population density
<br />Hopkinton MA
<br />15,000
<br />28
<br />536
<br />Medway MA
<br />13,877
<br />12
<br />1,156
<br />Coventry CT
<br />12,435
<br />37
<br />336
<br />Lakeland TN
<br />12,430
<br />23
<br />540
<br />Blue Ash OH
<br />12,114
<br />8
<br />1,514
<br />Crestwood MO
<br />11,912
<br />4
<br />2,978
<br />Weston MA
<br />11,478
<br />17
<br />675
<br />Granby CT
<br />11,300
<br />41
<br />276
<br />Show Low AZ
<br />11,058
<br />47
<br />235
<br />Lunenburg MA
<br />10,086
<br />27
<br />374
<br />Baker City OR
<br />9,890
<br />7
<br />1,413
<br />Shelton WA
<br />9,834
<br />6
<br />1,639
<br />Mason MI
<br />8,252
<br />5
<br />1,650
<br />Georgetown MA
<br />8,100
<br />13
<br />623
<br />Purcellville VA
<br />7,727
<br />3
<br />2,576
<br />Mahomet IL
<br />7,258
<br />9
<br />806
<br />Fox Point WI
<br />6,665
<br />3
<br />2,222
<br />Islamorada Islands FL
<br />6,119
<br />6
<br />1,020
<br />Airway Heights WA
<br />6,114
<br />5
<br />1,223
<br />Lake Mills WI
<br />5,735
<br />4
<br />1,434
<br />New Baden IL
<br />3,349
<br />2
<br />1,675
<br />Cherryvale KS
<br />2,374
<br />2
<br />1,187
<br />Suggestions for Using the Report
<br />CPM 101 Annual Report: FY 2011 Introduction
<br />• Examine the Results
<br />Local governments and their departments can examine their performance on each indicator and
<br />identify where they appear to be doing well, or where they might need to focus efforts for
<br />improvement, compared with other jurisdictions. They can compare their performance with the
<br />values of other jurisdictions' performance for any given indicator, the mean (average) value for all
<br />the reporting jurisdictions, and /or the median (middle) value for all the reporting jurisdictions.
<br />Additionally, jurisdictions should look closely to assess the reasons for their performance level and,
<br />where appropriate, develop plans for improvement. They can compare current and prior year
<br />performance levels to help assess whether the actions taken in the past produced the desired
<br />improvements.
<br />OICMA Center for Performance Measurement'"
<br />Population
<br />Land area
<br />(in square miles)
<br />Population density
<br />CPM 101
<br />Mean
<br />43,942
<br />115
<br />1,920
<br />Median
<br />23,819
<br />16
<br />1,572
<br />CPM 101 & Comprehensive
<br />Mean
<br />129,035
<br />104
<br />2,280
<br />Median
<br />38,394
<br />22
<br />1,804
<br />Suggestions for Using the Report
<br />CPM 101 Annual Report: FY 2011 Introduction
<br />• Examine the Results
<br />Local governments and their departments can examine their performance on each indicator and
<br />identify where they appear to be doing well, or where they might need to focus efforts for
<br />improvement, compared with other jurisdictions. They can compare their performance with the
<br />values of other jurisdictions' performance for any given indicator, the mean (average) value for all
<br />the reporting jurisdictions, and /or the median (middle) value for all the reporting jurisdictions.
<br />Additionally, jurisdictions should look closely to assess the reasons for their performance level and,
<br />where appropriate, develop plans for improvement. They can compare current and prior year
<br />performance levels to help assess whether the actions taken in the past produced the desired
<br />improvements.
<br />OICMA Center for Performance Measurement'"
<br />
|