Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 12 -2: Descriptors: Construction Purchases as a Percentage of Total Purchases by Central <br />Procurement Office <br />0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% <br />Fort Lauderdale FL 1% <br />Wauwatosa WI 2% <br />Granby CT 2% <br />Oshkosh WI ' 9% <br />Mason MI 19% <br />Islamorada Islands FL 21% <br />Annapolis MD 21% <br />Salisbury MD 21% <br />Dover NH 26% <br />Andover MA <br />New Braunfels TX <br />38% <br />CPM 101 Annual Report: FY2011 Procurement /134 <br />52% <br />Lancaster County SC 60% <br />Eau Claire WI 83% <br />Click to view definitions, raw <br />data information, and figure - <br />specific explanatory notes. <br />OICMA Center for Performance Measurement'" <br />Construction purchases <br />as percentage of total <br />CPM 101 <br />Mean <br />27% <br />Median <br />21% <br />CPM 101 & Comprehensive <br />Mean <br />27% <br />Median <br />23% <br />Figure 12 -2: Descriptors: Construction Purchases as a Percentage of Total Purchases by Central <br />Procurement Office <br />0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% <br />Fort Lauderdale FL 1% <br />Wauwatosa WI 2% <br />Granby CT 2% <br />Oshkosh WI ' 9% <br />Mason MI 19% <br />Islamorada Islands FL 21% <br />Annapolis MD 21% <br />Salisbury MD 21% <br />Dover NH 26% <br />Andover MA <br />New Braunfels TX <br />38% <br />CPM 101 Annual Report: FY2011 Procurement /134 <br />52% <br />Lancaster County SC 60% <br />Eau Claire WI 83% <br />Click to view definitions, raw <br />data information, and figure - <br />specific explanatory notes. <br />OICMA Center for Performance Measurement'" <br />