Laserfiche WebLink
The Role of Tree Preservation rdinances <br />in Green Infrastructure <br />By Nancy Templeton, AICP, and David Rouse, AICP <br />The premise of green infrastructure planning is that the vegetative elements of the <br />landscape, including trees, shrubs, grass, etc., interact with other natural systems <br />of air, water, and soil to protect and enhance ecosystem functionality within urban <br />environments. <br />Central to the concept of sustainable <br />development and green infrastructure is that <br />amenity and functionality come together <br />to provide a "triple bottom line" of social, <br />environmental, and economic benefits to <br />people and the planet. While all vegetative <br />elements, including open green spaces, are <br />part of a community's green infrastructure <br />network, urban forests arguably comprise <br />the largest structural component of the <br />network. Close to 8o percent of U.S. citizens <br />live in urban areas. It is estimated that <br />urban forests in the United States contain <br />about 3.8 billion trees (Alig, Carr, Comas, <br />Greenfield, Nowak, Randier, Stein, 2oio). <br />As urban areas continue to expand across <br />the country, communities will depend more <br />and more on the benefits of the urban <br />forest as the largest component of the <br />green infrastructure network. Protecting and <br />enhancing this valuable resource is critical <br />as a growing body of research and planning <br />in green infrastructure has quantified the <br />social, environmental, and fiscal benefits of <br />the urban forest. <br />SOCIAL BENEFITS OF THE URBAN FOREST <br />Research on the impacts of trees on public <br />health, safety, social behavior, and com- <br />munity interaction indicates that there are <br />direct positive social influences from ex- <br />posure to trees. For example, a 2001 study <br />by Frances Kuo and William Sullivan of the <br />University of Illinois compared the social <br />behavior of low-income residents living in <br />different parts of the Robert Taylor Homes <br />public housing complex in Chicago. One part <br />of the complex was planted with trees and <br />other greenery, while the other had little or <br />no landscaping. The study concluded that <br />residents with views of trees and greenery <br />from their homes experienced more social <br />interaction with neighbors and less ag- <br />gressive behavior toward their partners or <br />children. <br />+ GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE <br />Green infrastructure encompasses the <br />naturally occurring and human -built <br />features that manage stormwater, remove <br />pollutants, conserve energy, and provide <br />other ecological, cost-effective, and <br />environmentally sustainable services <br />(Vibrant Cities & Urban Forests Task Force <br />2011). <br />•v URBAN FORESTRY <br />Urban Forestry means the planning, <br />establishment, protection, and <br />management of trees and associated <br />plants, individually, in small groups, or <br />under forest conditions within cities, their <br />suburbs, and towns (Cooperative Forestry <br />Act 1978). <br />Trees have also been recognized as <br />positively influencing the academic perfor- <br />mance of high school students based on <br />research findings for "attention restoration" <br />theory (Augustin and Cackowski-Campbell <br />zoll). Attention restoration theory, devel- <br />oped by the University of Michigan School <br />of Natural Resources and Environment, sug- <br />gests that exposure to natural environments, <br />either visual or tactical, restores mental en- <br />ergy and enhances concentration. <br />Crime and public safety are additional <br />social conditions impacted by trees. There <br />has been some disagreement among <br />scholars as to whether trees deter crime <br />by attracting more people to an area and <br />signifying community strength, or facilitate <br />it by providing concealment for criminals. <br />A study by a team of environmental re- <br />searchers from the University of Vermont <br />examined crime rates and tree canopy cov- <br />erage over an area from inner city Baltimore <br />to suburban Baltimore County. Although <br />disparities were found primarily because <br />of the diversity in scale from urban to sub- <br />urban communities, the researchers found <br />that "a io% increase in tree canopy was <br />associated with a roughly 12% decrease <br />in crime" (Troy, Grove, and O'Neil -Dunne <br />2oi2). In areas where high canopy coverage <br />was also associated with high crime rates, <br />it was found that poorly groomed and low- <br />lying vegetation provided concealment for <br />criminal activity. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF THE <br />URBAN FOREST <br />The environmental benefits of urban forestry <br />as a component of the green infrastructure <br />network are well documented by federal <br />agencies such as the U.S. Environmental <br />Protection Agency and the U.S. Forest <br />Service, as well as state departments of nat- <br />ural resources, universities, and local utility <br />and watershed organizations. According <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 9.12 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 2 <br />