|
The Role of Tree Preservation rdinances
<br />in Green Infrastructure
<br />By Nancy Templeton, AICP, and David Rouse, AICP
<br />The premise of green infrastructure planning is that the vegetative elements of the
<br />landscape, including trees, shrubs, grass, etc., interact with other natural systems
<br />of air, water, and soil to protect and enhance ecosystem functionality within urban
<br />environments.
<br />Central to the concept of sustainable
<br />development and green infrastructure is that
<br />amenity and functionality come together
<br />to provide a "triple bottom line" of social,
<br />environmental, and economic benefits to
<br />people and the planet. While all vegetative
<br />elements, including open green spaces, are
<br />part of a community's green infrastructure
<br />network, urban forests arguably comprise
<br />the largest structural component of the
<br />network. Close to 8o percent of U.S. citizens
<br />live in urban areas. It is estimated that
<br />urban forests in the United States contain
<br />about 3.8 billion trees (Alig, Carr, Comas,
<br />Greenfield, Nowak, Randier, Stein, 2oio).
<br />As urban areas continue to expand across
<br />the country, communities will depend more
<br />and more on the benefits of the urban
<br />forest as the largest component of the
<br />green infrastructure network. Protecting and
<br />enhancing this valuable resource is critical
<br />as a growing body of research and planning
<br />in green infrastructure has quantified the
<br />social, environmental, and fiscal benefits of
<br />the urban forest.
<br />SOCIAL BENEFITS OF THE URBAN FOREST
<br />Research on the impacts of trees on public
<br />health, safety, social behavior, and com-
<br />munity interaction indicates that there are
<br />direct positive social influences from ex-
<br />posure to trees. For example, a 2001 study
<br />by Frances Kuo and William Sullivan of the
<br />University of Illinois compared the social
<br />behavior of low-income residents living in
<br />different parts of the Robert Taylor Homes
<br />public housing complex in Chicago. One part
<br />of the complex was planted with trees and
<br />other greenery, while the other had little or
<br />no landscaping. The study concluded that
<br />residents with views of trees and greenery
<br />from their homes experienced more social
<br />interaction with neighbors and less ag-
<br />gressive behavior toward their partners or
<br />children.
<br />+ GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
<br />Green infrastructure encompasses the
<br />naturally occurring and human -built
<br />features that manage stormwater, remove
<br />pollutants, conserve energy, and provide
<br />other ecological, cost-effective, and
<br />environmentally sustainable services
<br />(Vibrant Cities & Urban Forests Task Force
<br />2011).
<br />•v URBAN FORESTRY
<br />Urban Forestry means the planning,
<br />establishment, protection, and
<br />management of trees and associated
<br />plants, individually, in small groups, or
<br />under forest conditions within cities, their
<br />suburbs, and towns (Cooperative Forestry
<br />Act 1978).
<br />Trees have also been recognized as
<br />positively influencing the academic perfor-
<br />mance of high school students based on
<br />research findings for "attention restoration"
<br />theory (Augustin and Cackowski-Campbell
<br />zoll). Attention restoration theory, devel-
<br />oped by the University of Michigan School
<br />of Natural Resources and Environment, sug-
<br />gests that exposure to natural environments,
<br />either visual or tactical, restores mental en-
<br />ergy and enhances concentration.
<br />Crime and public safety are additional
<br />social conditions impacted by trees. There
<br />has been some disagreement among
<br />scholars as to whether trees deter crime
<br />by attracting more people to an area and
<br />signifying community strength, or facilitate
<br />it by providing concealment for criminals.
<br />A study by a team of environmental re-
<br />searchers from the University of Vermont
<br />examined crime rates and tree canopy cov-
<br />erage over an area from inner city Baltimore
<br />to suburban Baltimore County. Although
<br />disparities were found primarily because
<br />of the diversity in scale from urban to sub-
<br />urban communities, the researchers found
<br />that "a io% increase in tree canopy was
<br />associated with a roughly 12% decrease
<br />in crime" (Troy, Grove, and O'Neil -Dunne
<br />2oi2). In areas where high canopy coverage
<br />was also associated with high crime rates,
<br />it was found that poorly groomed and low-
<br />lying vegetation provided concealment for
<br />criminal activity.
<br />ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF THE
<br />URBAN FOREST
<br />The environmental benefits of urban forestry
<br />as a component of the green infrastructure
<br />network are well documented by federal
<br />agencies such as the U.S. Environmental
<br />Protection Agency and the U.S. Forest
<br />Service, as well as state departments of nat-
<br />ural resources, universities, and local utility
<br />and watershed organizations. According
<br />ZONINGPRACTICE 9.12
<br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 2
<br />
|