My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/09/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 10/09/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:24:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 4:16:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/09/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 10/09/2012 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />6. 1. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Adopting Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of Drainage and Utility Easement on 8250 <br />163rd Ave NW; Case of William Nemec and Shari Monchamp <br />Background: <br />In 2011, the property owners of 8250 163rd Ave NW had a licensed land surveyor complete a survey of the <br />property. The results of that survey indicated that an existing detached accessory building on the property <br />encroached within both an existing drainage and utility easement as well as within the required ten (10) foot <br />setback for an accessory building. The property owner contacted the City to discuss his options to correct these <br />issues, which included requesting the vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easement on their property and <br />either an administrative subdivision or a variance to address the setback encroachment. The property owners have <br />successfully negotiated the purchase of a small portion of property from the neighbor to address the structure <br />setback issue, which is being processed as an Adminstrative Subdivision, and have submitted an application <br />requesting the vacation of a portion of the drainage and utility easement along their western boundary. <br />Notification: <br />In accordance with State Statute and City Code, Staff attempted to notify all property owners within 350 of the <br />Subject Property of the Public Hearing via Standard US Mail and a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the <br />Anoka County Union. <br />Observations: <br />A detached accessory building was constructed on the property by the previous property owner in 2001. The <br />previous property owner had applied for and received a building permit for this structure. However, the submitted <br />site drawing that accompanied the permit application showed the detached buidling located twenty (20) feet from <br />the side property boundary, and thus the permit was approved. The recently completed survey of the lot shows that <br />the detached building is actually located approximately six (6) feet from the property boundary. <br />When this area was platted, ten (10) foot wide drainage and utility easements were provided along all lot lines. So, <br />along this common lot line, there is actually twenty (20) feet of easement area. The building has been in place for <br />over ten (10) years now and there have not been any issues with drainage in the area, even with the encroachment. <br />Furthermore, Staff has contacted the various utility companies and it does not appear that there are any utilities <br />within this easement along this common lot line; however, there are utilities in the easement that runs parallel with <br />163rd Ave. Thus, the request is to vacate the eastern five (5) feet of the drainage and utility easement, excluding the <br />northern and southern ten (10) feet. <br />The ordinance was introduced at the September 25, 2012 City Council meeting and is now eligible for adoption. <br />Recommendation: <br />Since this structure has been in place, there have been no drainage issues reported. There appear to be no existing <br />utilities throughout this stretch of easement, which cumulatively, is ten (10) feet wider than the standard drainage <br />and utility easements required presently. Thus, Staff recommends adopting the ordinance to vacate a portion of the <br />drainage and utility easement, which, in conjunction with an Adminstrative Subdivision, would bring this structure <br />into compliance with City Code. <br />Funding Source: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.