Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5.2. <br />Meeting Date: 10/16/2012 <br />By: Shane Nelson, Engineering /Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Resident Concern - 167th Avenue (IP08 -27) <br />Background: <br />The residents' property was impacted by the 167th Avenue Reconstruction Project, City Project 08 -27, that was <br />constructed in 2009. The resident called City Administrator Ulrich on 7/10/12 and expressed that she was not <br />satisfied with the restoration of her yard. Interim City Engineer Nelson returned the phone call and spoke with Mrs. <br />Dominguez on July 11, 2012 and listened to her concerns, summarized as follows: <br />• Weeds in grass, feels that they are moving into the rest of her yard <br />• Insufficient topsoil quality <br />• Pieces of asphalt in yard <br />• Pieces of glass in yard <br />• Pieces of slate in yard <br />• Pieces of shingles in yard <br />• Sparse grass <br />• Clover instead of bluegrass (wrong mix) <br />• Remnants of erosion control netting <br />Overall, Mrs. Dominguez stated that she did not get what she was told she was getting. She stated that previous <br />City Engineer Himmer had told her that her yard would be as good, or better, than it was before construction <br />began. At one point in time, the City picked rocks and chunks of broken glass from the subject properties utilizing <br />the DOC crews. Mrs. Dominguez stated that she is against the DOC crews visiting her property again. <br />Staff reviewed the original plans and specifications, dated 2/27/09, prepared by Bolton and Menk, in an effort to <br />understand the project. The project provided an 8 inch sewer stub and an 8 inch water stub to the subject property <br />for future development, with the stubs located on a common lot line at the eastern edge of their property. The <br />project also provided a new road that the Dominquez's use for their primary access. There was no assessment for <br />the improvements. The original specifications did require the Contractor to re -seed any areas that did not establish <br />at the Contractor's expense. <br />The Final Payment was made to the Prime Contractor on the project on November 23, 2010, therefore, there is no <br />recourse with the original Contractor. We understand that the Contractor did not receive compensation for turf <br />establishment in this area as the City felt it did not meet project specifications. <br />The City contracted separately with Great Northern Landscapes in 2010 to restore the residents yard as an attempt <br />to address their concerns at that time. Finance Director Lund provided an invoice that was paid on 12/14/10 in the <br />amount of $6,138 to Great Northern Landscapes for work completed and accepted by the City at that time. The <br />City did hold back 10% retainage, or $682, from the invoice amount. <br />Notification: <br />The resident (Shayle Dominguez) has been notified of the meeting and was invited to attend <br />Observations: <br />