My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/16/2012 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 10/16/2012 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:24:44 PM
Creation date
10/19/2012 11:43:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
10/16/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There are twelve (12) proposed parking stalls shown on the site plan, which complies with the minimum and <br />maximum standards outlined in the Design Framework (for retail, a minimum of 2 stalls per 1,000 square feet of <br />building and a maximum of 4 stalls per 1,000 square feet of building space). The Applicant has stated that they do <br />not intend to participate in any shared parking arrangements between Lots 2-4 Block 1 COR TWO. <br />Maneuverability for passenger vehicles appears to sufficient. A truck maneuvering exhibit has been submitted. Staff <br />noted some concern about the maneuverability of fuel trucks and potential conflicts with passenger vehicles when <br />the fuel truck would back up within the site and has requested feedback from the Applicant regarding site layout <br />and truck maneuverability. The Applicant has since stated that the truck route would be altered so that fuel trucks <br />would enter through the secondary access (the north entrance) and exit through the southeast access. This route <br />would eliminate the need for a fuel truck to back up within the site, which reduces the potential conflict between <br />truck traffic and passenger vehicles. <br />The grading/drainage and landscaping plans are generally acceptable with requested revisions outlined in the <br />Staff Review File dated October 12, 2012. <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing concerning the conditional use permit request for motor fuel sales <br />and an accessory, commercial car wash on October 4, 2012. There were no written or verbal comments submitted <br />regarding this request. <br />Recommendation: <br />Based on the revised elevations and renderings, the Planning Commission has recommended approving the site plan <br />and the conditional use permit for motor fuel sales and an accessory, commercial car wash contingent upon <br />compliance with the Staff Review File. However, the Planning Commission requested two (2) additions to the <br />Findings of Fact and one (1) amendment to the conditional use permit, based on a request from the Applicant. <br />The Planning Commission recommended that the Findings of Fact be revised to include the following: <br />That the proposed use and layout are acceptable due to the unique design constraints of the lot, the location <br />within The COR, the street designations, and the orientation of the building; and <br />That the proposed car wash is acceptable due to recent zoning amendments that identify this area as <br />being more auto -oriented. <br />The Planning Commission recommended that the Conditional Use Permit be revised to permit a twenty-four (24) <br />hours per day operation, seven (7) days per week. <br />The first finding and the revision to the Conditional Use Permit have been incorporated into the documents for <br />consideration this evening. The second finding was requested by the Planning Commission to address their <br />concern of recommending approval for this car wash while a previous request (in 2004) for an accessory car wash <br />for the Coborn's site did not receive a favorable recommendation by the Planning Commission. However, after <br />Staff reviewed the 2004 case, it was apparent that the Planning Commission had, in fact, recommended approval of <br />the conditional use permit and that the City Council had approved the conditional use permit; the applicant, <br />for unspecified reasons, had subsequently withdrawn their request for a conditional use permit. <br />Therefore, this finding was not incorporated into the Findings of Fact for consideration this evening. <br />Funding Source: <br />All cost associated with processing the application are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Council Action: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.