My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/16/2012 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 10/16/2012 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:24:44 PM
Creation date
10/19/2012 11:43:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
10/16/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Special Session <br />Meeting Date: 10/16/2012 <br />By: Diana Lund, Finance <br />Title: <br />Comparison of final pro -forma and Current Draw Schedule in Regard to the Residence at The COR <br />4.2. <br />Background: <br />Councilmember Elvig has raised concerns in relation to the amount of developeribuilder overhead/contingencies <br />stated on the current draw schedules for the Residence at The COR project in comparison to what was was shown <br />on the final proforma document. <br />Councilmember Elving's concerns stemmed from the $500,0000 prepayment request from F&C. It was at this <br />time that he begin to ask questions in regard to developer fees on the draw versus the proforma that F&C had <br />originally submitted. <br />Currently, the finance director is the staff person designated to oversee the draw requests and submit bond <br />payments after the bank and title companies have signed off with their approvals. <br />To bring all members - staff, council and F&C ion the same page, a brief overview and understanding of the two <br />documents (proforma and draw schedule budget) is needed. <br />Observations: <br />Attached are the draw schedule and sources/uses that was used at time of bonding from Ehlers. <br />Councilmbmers Elvig's question is related to the items high -lighted in yellow on both sheets and the amount of <br />overhead and contingencies listed on the draw schedule happening to equal a little over $3M -which happens to be <br />the amount of equity F&C is supposed to put into the project, thus their equity would really be funded with bond <br />proceeds. <br />A brief comparison of the two sheets: <br />The total amount that shows on the draw schedule is $33,625,980. This amount was achieved as such: <br />$29,600,000 Project costs listed below <br />$2,374,000 city development fees (this is listed as uses & sources under draw schedule so nets itself out) <br />$1,440,000 Additional Land costs (this also nets itself out as land is shown as $2,190,000 use and $1,440,000,000 <br />source to arrive at land proceeds city received of $750,000) <br />$211,000 municipal financing fees (this is the $91,000 in closing costs that they paid back and the $120,000 paid <br />back on the TIF loan of $1,420,000) <br />Total $33,625,000 <br />Cross-referenced the Draw schedule of the $33,625,000 and the Proforma shows differences (outside of the <br />$211,000 listed above) is the $1,349,905 of developer fee listed below(in yellow) which consists of $149,905 in <br />travel and $1,200,000 in Dev OH on the draw schedule. <br />Funding Source: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.