Laserfiche WebLink
Development Services Manager Gladhill requested further comment from the Commission on <br />the architectural design standards and outdoor storage in the proposed E-3 district. <br />Commissioner Brauer questioned if the rezoning made the property today made it easier for a <br />corporate campus to come to the City of Ramsey. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill indicated the rezoning would simplify the process for <br />future tenants of the site. <br />Commissioner Bauer inquired if offices were allowed in the E-1 and E-2 districts. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill explained this was an allowed use in both districts <br />currently. <br />Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner Schiller, to direct Staff to research <br />and revise the existing E-1 and E-2 zoning districts to allow for a corporate campus and report <br />back to the Commission. <br />Further discussion <br />Commissioner Van Scoy understood that E-1 or E-2 could fit this site. However, to properly <br />guide the site into becoming a highly desirable site, the E-3 zoning district was necessary. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners Brauer, Bauer, Field, Perez, <br />and Schiller. Voting No: Van Scoy. Absent: None. <br />Chairperson Levine asked if the delay would affect any current proposals. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill noted the City did not have any current development <br />requests at this time. <br />5.05: Public Hearing: Review Zoning Ordinance Amendments Related to the 2030 <br />Comprehensive Plan and General Updates <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Levine called the public hearing to order at 8:00 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Planning Consultant Goodroad presented the staff report and reviewed the proposed zoning <br />ordinance amendments in detail related to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. She explained that <br />Staff has completed updates necessary to implement the 2030 Comprehensive Plane, as well as <br />certain other previously discussed amendments. Many of the proposed changes are simply a <br />Planning Commission/September 6, 2012 <br />Page 9 of 18 <br />