Laserfiche WebLink
PARKING MEMORANDUM <br />TO: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS <br />FROM: TIM GLADHILL, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MANAGER <br />SUBJECT: PARKING STANDARDS FOR THE COR <br />DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 <br />CC: NONE <br />On your agenda this evening is a request for Site Plan Approval of Northgate Performing Arts <br />Center. A key component of this review is the construction of adequate parking to serve the needs of the <br />proposed development. A key goal of The COR Design Framework is to attempt to reduce the amount of <br />surface parking to achieve the goal of shared parking and high density/floor area ratios. A reduction in off- <br />street parking can be accomplished by two (2) broad approaches: 1) construction of vertical parking <br />structures or 2) encouragement of use of on -street parking. <br />As it relates to the current proposal, there are two (2) options to consider: 1) construct the required <br />amount of spaces on -site or 2) secure shared parking easements with adjacent users. <br />City Code allows users to reduce the amount of aggregate parking required for multiple users when <br />said arrangement is secured through a recordable easement that is recorded with the Anoka County Recorder. <br />This recordable document ensures that the user has the legal ability to use the parking consistent with the <br />agreed terms. The recordable document becomes part of title that is disclosed at any sale of property. The <br />recordable document survives transfer of ownership, default, foreclosure, etc. The recordable document <br />prevents the owner of the adjacent parcel from terminating the agreement. <br />As it relates to the current proposal, the Applicant has secured written approval from PACT Charter <br />School; however, the agreement does not provide for an easement to be recorded. As the record from the <br />Planning Commission Meeting reflects, Staff responded that none of the agreements with the adjacent users <br />can be used to calculate the minimum number of parking spaces required unless the agreement is recorded as <br />an easement. Staff then focused the analysis via on -site parking. <br />The Applicant has proposed constructing approximately forty (40) spaces with the initial <br />construction. An additional approximately forty (40) spaces as `proof -of -parking.' Proof -of -Parking is a <br />concept that the Applicant demonstrates that a certain number of parking spaces could be constructed if <br />parking demand necessitated said construction, but is not immediately constructed. Finally, the Applicant <br />proposes counting adjacent on -street parking stalls to lead to another twenty-five (25) spaces. The Applicant <br />understands that based on the current facts, Phase II is not feasible unless shared parking easements are <br />recorded with adjacent users. <br />In other areas of the community, the City has approved the use of Proof of Parking to satisfy the <br />needs of required parking. This is true for both for -profit and non-profit entities. For example, assisted living <br />uses have commonly requested to install a portion of the required parking, while showing the remainder as <br />proof of parking. This approach has also been used in the employment districts, when the user has submitted <br />a parking plan that includes an analysis of actual demand based on occupancy. <br />As a Conditional Use Permit is required for this use, the City has the opportunity to attach <br />reasonable conditions to mitigate concerns raised by the proposed use. In this instance, a potential reasonable <br />