Laserfiche WebLink
Development Manager Lazan presented the original proforma. <br />Finance Director Lund stated she has only seen a $2.4 million developer fee. <br />Development Manager Lazan clarified that is a fee paid to the City. <br />HRA Executive Director Ulrich agreed the developer fee and developer's overhead are two <br />separate fees. <br />Finance Director Lund reviewed the amounts and purpose of each. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated it was his understanding there are typically development fees paid to <br />the City, developer's fees paid to themselves as a profit on the project, and overhead that pays <br />themselves a rate for staff and things like the construction trailer. A developer fee is their profit <br />and he does not want that paid until the HRA gets paid back. Commissioner Elvig stated PNC <br />Bank had agreed to this and that was about $3 million. Now the developer fee is $1.2 million so <br />he would like to see if the developer overhead also came down so they did not need that <br />$500,000. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated the HRA had reviewed the model containing all the fees and <br />costs and the only fee to the developer was $970,000. PNC Bank originally required that all to <br />stay in but have now agreed to advance one -half of that amount to the City so F &C will be into <br />PNC Bank money faster. <br />Chairperson McGlone stated he does not care if they use $500,000 to pay down the loan and get <br />to the Bank's money faster. <br />Commissioner Backous stated he did not approve of giving those dollars in the first place but his <br />goal is to get the HRA's money back. He stated he understands Commissioner Elvig's concern <br />there may be a "shell game" moving money around but if they are giving back $500,000 sooner, <br />and will owe the HRA $500,000 less, he would agree with the request even if the HRA makes <br />less interest. <br />Chairperson McGlone agreed the request will result in the HRA getting its money back faster. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated he would like to see an audit between what we initially signed and <br />schedule of values to get a better understanding. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated that was done when the original draw schedules were set up. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated the HRA needs to compare the documentation to see if funds have <br />been switched. If that is the case, the sources of uses will also be changed. He felt the City <br />Council had a financial obligation to look at it internally and the HRA should also sign off on it. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / October 2, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />