Laserfiche WebLink
March 10, 2012 1 Volume 61 No. 5 Zoning Bulletin <br />near the City of Driggs (the "City"). The Property was located in an un- <br />incorporated part of the County that was within the City's area of im- <br />pact. Pursuant to an agreement between the County and the City, the <br />City's zoning laws applied to that area of impact, and thus the Property. <br />Burns sought to construct a concrete batch plant on the Property. <br />Burns' plans included erection of a structure that was 75 feet high. The <br />City's zoning ordinance provided that "[a]ny building or structure ... <br />erected shall not exceed forty-five (45) feet in height unless approved by <br />[CUP]." Accordingly, Burns applied for a CUP. <br />The City planning and zoning department approved the CUP to in- <br />crease the height limitation on Burns' Property to 75 feet. The matter <br />was sent to the Courity for its approval. <br />The County denied the CUP. <br />Burns appealed to court. For the first time, the County argued that Burns' <br />application for a CUP had to be denied because Idaho Code § 67-6516 of <br />the Local Land Use Planning Act ("LLUPA") required a variance in order to <br />obtain a waiver of a zoning provision limiting the height of buildings. <br />The court rejected the County's argument that Burns should have ap- <br />plied for a variance rather than a CUP because: the ordinance allowed <br />for a CUP; and the County's argument came too late. Nevertheless, the <br />court upheld the denial of the CUP on other grounds. <br />Burns appealed. <br />DECISION: Affirmed. <br />The Supreme Court of Idaho did not address the issues raised by <br />Burns on appeal. Instead, it held that a CUP could not be used to waive <br />a provision of a zoning ordinance limiting the maximum height of build- <br />ings and structures. Height restrictions can be waived only by a variance, <br />not a CUP, said the court. It concluded that Burns was required to seek a <br />variance in order to obtain a waiver of the maximum height limitation in <br />the zoning ordinance. <br />In so holding, the court explained that "[a] variance is a means of ob- <br />taining a waiver of certain requirements of a zoning ordinance." Idaho <br />Code S 67-6516 of LLUPA defined a variance as: <br />"a modification of the bulk and placement requirements of <br />the ordinance as to lot size, lot coverage, width, depth, front <br />yard, side yard, rear yard, setbacks, parking space, height of <br />buildings, or other ordinance provision affecting the size or <br />shape of a structure of the placement of the structure upon <br />lots, or the size of lots. <br />10 © 2012 Thomson Reuters <br />