My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:11:01 AM
Creation date
10/31/2012 4:17:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/03/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Promoting Flood Resiliency <br />Through the Regulatory Process <br />By Terri L. Turner, AICP <br />Flooding occurs in all regions of the United States and at all times of the year. <br />One in three disaster declarations is a result <br />of flooding, and an increase in population, <br />increased development in flood -prone ar- <br />eas, and a predicted increase in intensified <br />rain events due to climate change will only <br />exacerbate those numbers. <br />Flood resiliency can be defined as the <br />integration of roles, responsibilities, and <br />governance necessary to adapt to the -vari- <br />ous risks associated with flooding and the <br />ability to withstand and rapidly recover from <br />disruptions in function after a flood event. <br />Successful flood resiliency should be- <br />gin at the community level with individuals <br />taking personal accountability for their re- <br />lationship to the environment around them <br />and the associated risk that this environ- <br />ment can impose. Unfortunately, resiliency <br />is, all too often, viewed by the general public <br />as being the exclusive responsibility of local, <br />state, or federal governments. Many mitiga- <br />tion and planning practitioners attribute <br />this mindset to a lack of public outreach and <br />education about risk and resiliency. In other <br />words, we haven't done enough to fostera <br />culture in which hazards, such as flooding, <br />are identified, planned for, and then miti- <br />gated so that the vulnerability to the disas- <br />ter is lessened and the community's ability <br />to withstand and rapidly recover from the <br />disaster is increased. <br />The regulatory process is an essential <br />tool in the arsenal of fighting floods and <br />promoting flood resiliency. Zoning, building <br />codes, and other regulatory measures can <br />ensure that fewer vulnerable structures are <br />built in flood -prone areas, fewer lives are <br />put at risk, and fewer losses, to both prop - <br />In January zaio, the Rocky Creek <br />in Augusta,, Georgia, flooded <br />several homes. However, the <br />frequency and duration of <br />damaging flooding events has. <br />been reduced dramatically since <br />the city revised its floodplain <br />ordinance in z000. <br />erty and people, are incurred due to unwise <br />' development patterns. <br />A LOOK AT THE NFIP <br />The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) <br />was developed in 1.968 as a part of the <br />National Flood Insurance Act. The NFIP is a <br />voluntary agreement between the federal <br />government and participating communi- <br />ties in which the federal government offers <br />subsidized flood insurance to communities <br />that agree to adopt and enforce a flood ordi- <br />nance that, at a minimum, meets the federal <br />standards to reduce future flood risk to new <br />construction in floodplains. Flood insurance, <br />now provided to nearly zo,000 communi- <br />ties across the United States through the <br />NFIP, was designed to provide an insurance <br />alternative to disaster assistance and also <br />to reduce the escalating costs of repairing <br />damage to buildings and their contents after <br />a flood event. Buildings constructed in accor- <br />dance with minimum NFIP building standards <br />suffer approximately 8o percent less damage <br />annually than those buildings not built in <br />compliance with the minimum standards. <br />Without homes and workplaces that <br />are resilient to natural disasters, there is <br />no chance of a sustainable local economy. <br />While the NFIP has been the most cost-effec- <br />tive hazard mitigation tool in the history of <br />this nation, flood losses in the United States <br />continue to worsen. In fact, these increasing <br />flood losses can be attributed, in part, to <br />federally backed flood insurance that en- <br />courages at -risk development in the Special <br />Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Consequently, <br />there is still a gap in land -use regulation <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 4.12 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION i page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.