Laserfiche WebLink
Case #6: <br /> <br />Request For Final Plat Approval Of Northfork 4th Addition; <br />Case Of Mr. Dennis Peck: <br /> <br />Mr. Banwart stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval <br />of Northfork 4th Addition with park dedication requirements to be satisfied by a cash <br />payment in accordance with the park dedication requirements in effect at the time of final <br />plat approval. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember DeLuca and seconded by Councilmember Cich to adopt <br />Resolution #89-03-49 granting final plat approval to Northfork 4th Addition. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case g7: <br /> <br />Update on River's Bend Park South Development; <br />Improvement Project #89-1: <br /> <br />Mr. Otto reported that there is a conflict among the government agencies regarding an <br />approved aligment for an access road to River's Bend Park South; City Staff will be <br />meeting with the Corps of Engineers and Anoka County on Monday, March 20 to <br />hopefully come to a resolution. In the interim, the bid date for the project needs to be <br />extended Ramsey should also request an extension for the use of Community Development <br />Block Grant funds beyond April 1, 1989. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember DeLuca and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to extend the <br />bid date for Improvement Project #89~1 to April 10, 1989 and submit a written request to <br />Anoka County for an extension beyond April 1, 1989 for the use of Community <br />Development Block Grant funds. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #8: Response To Landfill Siting Process: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that Site P is one of three sites in Anoka County proposed for a future <br />landfill. The County is preparing an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) for the three sites. <br />Prior to preparing the EIS, Anoka County prepared a scoping document and Ramsey <br />commented on that scoping document regarding what should be included in the EIS. <br />Ramsey has received documents that represent parts of the EIS and is being asked to <br />review them. This review requires technical expertise and Wenck and Assoicates has <br />quoted a price of $3600.00; the number of EIS documents yet to be reviewed that will <br />require technical expertise and associated costs is not known. Mr. Hartley also requested <br />direction from City Council regarding a general position City Staff should take regarding <br />Site P. <br /> <br />Council unanimously directed City Staff to continue to take a position of opposing Site P. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto stated that Staff's decision to obtain a cost estimate for review services from <br />Wenck Associates only was based on the following: <br /> <br />City Council/March 14, 1989 <br /> Page 10 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br />