Laserfiche WebLink
EDA LEVY AUTHORITY <br /> <br />By: Scan Sullivan, Economic Development / TIF Specialist <br /> <br />round: <br /> <br />On November 28, 1998 the City Council approved a resolution creating the EDA for the City of Ramsey. The resOlution <br />gives all the statutory powers of an Economic Development Authority (EDA) and Housing and Redevelopment Authority <br />(HRA) to the Ramsey EDA. <br /> <br />The EDA budget has been funded primarily through three sources: 1) the City General Fund, 2) proceeds from the sale of <br />City owned property and 3) monies from the Landfill Closure Statement. Property tax reform implemented for taxes <br />payable in 2002 along with levy limits, have limited the amount of funding necessary for land acquisition for <br />redevelopment projects and hiring development consultants. It is important for the EDA to have the ability to make <br />purchases of property, sometimes on short notice, so that it able to assemble properties in a timely manner for <br />redevelopment. Additionally, it is also important to have adequate funding in order utilize consulting tools for <br />development and redevelopment. <br /> <br />The enabling resolution adopted in 1998 requires that ail recommendations by the EDA be sent to the City Council for <br />approval before any action is taken. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />Recently property, west of Armstrong Boulevard, in the proposed town center area was put up for sale by a private party. <br />EDA had given Staff direction to identify a funding source and to bring it back to EDA for consideration to buy. Staff <br />researched this for EDA and found no readily available funds for the purchase of the Menkveld property. As with many <br />real estate transactions, another buyer with immediate purchasing ability, stepped forward and acquired the Menkveld <br />property while the City was twing to find a acceptable funding source. By allowing the EDA to have stable funding to <br />supplement appropriations from the City General Fund and land sale proceeds, it would enable the EDA to make quicker <br />recommendations to the City Council in regards to land purchases. This differs from TIF land purchases, which involve <br />significant planning and hearings (time) and have more stringent limitations on how funds can be spent. <br /> <br />In order to address future needs for land acquisition, participate in future redevelopment opportunities and the continue <br />the utilization of development consultants, it would be prudent for the EDA to seek additional funding. Currently, there <br />are three ways in which the EDA may receive funding. The first is how we fund our current EDA. We allocate money <br />from the General fund to the EDA budget and periodically transfer money to the EDA through the sales of certain real <br />estate transactions. Another way in which the EDA can be funded is through a requested 'EDA' Market Value Levy <br />through the City Council. This levy is determined by multiplying all the taxable market value in the city by 0.01813%. <br />(See Attached). This levy is, in effect, allocating a set amount of the General Fund (subject to levy 1/mits) to the EDA. <br />This does give the EDA the ability to make quicker decisions in regards to purchases but it does not increase the overall <br />budget of the City. The third levy type is a HRA levy. This levy is also Market Value based .and uses a percentage of <br />0.0144% (See Attached). The difference between the 'EDA' and 'I-IRA' levies is that the HRA levy falls outside the State <br />imposed levy limits. This increases the amount of money that the City will be able to use for redevelopment and <br />economic development activities. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Based on discussion <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />City Administrator, Jim Norman <br />Associate Planner, Megan Wald <br />Finance Director, Diana Lund <br /> <br />EDA: 09.04.02 <br /> <br /> <br />