#12-10-167 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

8) That the proposed auditorium is required to provide a minimum of 101 stalls on site. 9) That that Applicant proposes to provide 43 on -site parking stalls, 40 proof of parking stalls (on -site) and 25 on street parking stalls (along Peridot Street NW and 145th Avenue NW) to fulfill its required parking. 10) That the COR Design Framework states that the City may approve joint parking for one or more businesses where the total number of parking stalls provided for joint use is less than the sum of the total required for each business should provide them separately. Shared parking shall be approved only when it's in close proximity (300 foot radius), no conflict in hours and a legally binding instrument for joint use of off - street parking is approved by the City and recorded at the County. 11) That the Applicant proposes proof of parking as a method to save initial site development and construction costs. Northgate intends to share parking through cross- parking agreements with PACT, Allina and NAU and has an effective history shared parking with these users. 12) That the Applicant has not provided the City a legally binding instrument for joint use of off - street parking with any adjacent property owners. 13) That a condition of approval of the Conditional Use Permit, as pertaining to the proof of parking, requires that at such time that parking demand is beyond what is provided on -site and the 25 accepted on- street parking stalls, and extending into additional on- street parking areas beyond 300' radius of the site, such proof of parking shall be installed at the applicants expense. 14) That the proposed building material and overall building design meet the requirements of the COR Design Framework. 15) That the Applicant will be responsible for installation of a sidewalk and streetscaping along Peridot Street NW in accordance with the COR Design Framework. 16) That the proposed use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property by eminent domain in the foreseeable future. 17) That the proposed conditional use will not result in adverse effects on the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. 18) That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. 19) That the proposed use will not be dangerous or detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. Resolution #12 -10 -167 Page 2 of 4