My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/03/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/03/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:17:14 AM
Creation date
1/2/2013 8:48:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
01/03/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review File: McDonalds <br />Site Plan Review <br />December 28, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Exterior Materials: The application includes two (2) sheets of architectural elevations, dated December <br />10, 2012, as well as a color rendering of architectural elevations, dated December 20, 2012. Buildings <br />shall be finished with high-quality, durable materials such as glass, stone, brick, windows, canvas <br />awnings, etc. The exterior finish of the building appears to consist of face brick, brick accent bands, <br />dryvit accents (EIFS), corrugated metal panels, clear, tempered glass, two (2) roof cap accent elements <br />and an aluminum trellis. Subsequent to the initial submittal, a new rendering was submitted (December <br />20, 2012) that showed new windows on the north (rear) wall of the building (facing Sunwood Drive) and <br />eliminated the two (2) down spouts. If no other building configuration/orientation is feasible, further <br />enhancements to the north wall may still be necessary. The color architectural elevations, dated <br />December 20, 2012, include four (4) windows south of the entrance area while sheet A2.0, prepared by <br />Reprise Design Incorporated and dated December 10, 2012, only shows three (3) windows. Please <br />reconcile this discrepancy and resubmit. None of the 3D renderings or color architectural elevations <br />include down spouts that were originally included on the north wall. How is water going to be drained <br />from the roof area? Also, please note that Minnesota State Plumbing Code 4715 requires both primary <br />and secondary roof drainage be identified. <br />Waste Storage: The waste storage area is proposed to be integrated into the building at the north end <br />with access for servicing along the east wall of the building. <br />Off -Street Parking - Spaces Required: The Design Framework provides a range of allowable parking <br />stalls for restaurant uses, with a minimum of one (1) stall for each two (2) seats and a maximum of one <br />(1) stall for every one (1) seat. The site plan proposes fifty-one (51) off-street parking spaces. It is City <br />Staff's understanding that there may be shared parking for Lots 3-5 of Block 1. If it is the intent to <br />participate in a sharedparking arrangement with the other lots, please submit a sharedparking easement <br />for review prior to the City releasing the Building Permit. Please provide a seating plan for the building <br />to determine if the off-street parking provided complies with the Design Framework. Also, please update <br />Sheet C2.1 to include dimensions for the angled stalls in the parking summary. It appears that the intent <br />is to utilize some of the provided off-street parking spaces for loading/unloading, might there be a better <br />design to accommodate that need? The height of the handicap parking signs are shown to be measured <br />from top of curb but ICC/ANSI A117.1 2003section 502.7 requires that measurement to be made from the <br />parking surface. Finally, the parking stalls fronting Armstrong Blvd do require screening, which could <br />be in the form of a decorative wall, railing, hedge or combination of these elements, to a minimum height <br />of three (3) feet and a maximum height of four and a half (4.5) feet above the parking lot. Considering <br />the grade difference between the lot and Armstrong Blvd (presently and after the Armstrong <br />Blvd/Highway 10 interchange is complete), this screening may not be warranted, nonetheless, this is <br />identified for the City Council to consider. <br />Signs: Please note that all signs for the proposed building must be approved through a separate sign <br />permit process. Sign regulations can be found within the Design Framework as well as in City Code <br />Chapter 117, Article II, Division 8. The developer is encouraged to review these sign regulations early in <br />the process to avoid any unnecessary delays due to potential needs for special permits. No dimensions are <br />provided for any of the proposed signs and thus, only general feedback is possible at this time, which <br />includes the following: <br />• Wall, canopy or marquee signs are limited to fifteen percent (15%) of the front building facade <br />and at least fifty percent (50%) of the signage area must be placed on the measured wall. <br />• Menu boards are limited to one (1) per drive-thru lane and forty (40) square feet each. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.