Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember McGlone, due to the fact of an <br />outstanding grant that requires closing to approve the deferral of the development fees related to <br />the plat of COR TWO until the first closing on one of the three HRA lots — Lots 3 -5, COR TWO. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Ramsey, Councilmembers Elvig, McGlone, Backous, <br />Strommen, and Tossey. Voting No: None. Abstain: Councilmember Wise. <br />7.03: Consider Modification of TIF District 14 <br />City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the staff report and recommendation that it is in the City's <br />best interest to keep TIF District 14 in place until existing obligations are met, totaling $24 <br />million. <br />Motion by Mayor Ramsey, seconded by Councilmember Tossey, to decertify TIF District 14 for <br />any properties not encumbered. <br />Further discussion: Mayor Ramsey stated there is no mistaking the results of the election because <br />the people who won ran on the message that the City should not be involved in development. He <br />noted TIF was created to offset costs developers were usually required to pay and to protect the <br />businesses who built in The COR. However, "the people spoke" at the recent election to not <br />have the City involved in private development so there was no reason to keep TIF District #14 <br />intact. Councilmember Backous stated he had seconded a similar motion at the last meeting and <br />agreed the City should not be in the private development business or compete /manipulate the <br />free market; however, he felt it would be disrespectful to consider decertification of TIF District <br />#14 before the new Councilmembers are sworn in. Councilmember Backous stated he would <br />support this effort in January once the new members, who are duly elected officials, have a <br />chance to state their position. Councilmember Strommen agreed "the people spoke" in the <br />recent election that the City needed to get out of the development business but that does not <br />mean "pulling the plug" tomorrow. She found this to be a strategic issue the new Council needs <br />to address once it is seated in January. Councilmember Strommen stated the issue of TIF is <br />nested within that larger strategic discussion, which she welcomes. She supported staff <br />gathering additional information, bringing forward options for modification of the TIF District, <br />and a comprehensive financial analysis so the Council can hold deliberate and thoughtful <br />discussion once the new members are seated. Councilmember Tossey stated he had made the <br />motion to decertify at the last meeting but it was not supported by a majority. He believed that it <br />was still the right thing, noting TIF can become a "political football." He felt Ramsey should <br />compete with other cities by keeping its tax capacity lower to attract developments. <br />Councilmember Tossey stated the way to "starve the beast of government- controlled <br />development" is to cut the HRA levy in half and decertify TIF District #14. He felt TIF plays <br />favorites in choosing one business over another and that TIF should be eliminated Statewide. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated he spent the most time of any staff or Council member at the <br />Capitol to put TIF District #14 and design build authority into place. He stated if this Council or <br />next year's Council thinks Ramsey should be out of the development business, it should also be <br />out of the TIF District business. He stated that he has more TIF knowledge than any "newbie." <br />Regarding the comment that "the people spoke" at the recent election, he would question the <br />pamphlet distributed by "Citizens for Responsible Government," a pact that supported those who <br />City Council / November 13, 2012 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />