Laserfiche WebLink
Development Manager Lazan stated he held discussion with City Attorney Goodrich about <br />needing two quotes, but believed there was some "gray area" in the League's interpretation about <br />whether this was an add -on project or a new project. He explained the difficulty with bringing <br />another contractor into the first contractor's bid area under which the permits were issued. <br />Development Manager Lazan pointed out this is a public improvement project and continuation <br />of the two stubs so he found it was a continuation, not a new project. He stated he can't imagine <br />that a second quote to mobilize would be less expensive than this quote. <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised that Bond Counsel Tom Bray had stated it is not a "gray area" <br />and if the project cost $100,000, it is mandatory to obtain two quotes. He explained that change <br />orders with special assessment projects are in a different category and can be up to 25 %. This is <br />a different contract so two quotes are required. <br />Councilmember Strommen agreed this is a separate project, it was originated separately, and she <br />supports getting a second quote. <br />Councilmember McGlone agreed with the need for a second quote, noting it will probably be <br />higher but is required by the law. <br />Councilmember Wise questioned whether a contractor will be willing to put the work into <br />preparing a quote knowing it is probably a waste of time. <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised if the City cannot obtain a second quote, it will have to bid the <br />project. <br />Development Manager Lazan noted it is possible to approve a change order subject to the second <br />quote being at or lower than this amount. <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated he can craft motion language to address contingent approval, if <br />desired. <br />Councilmember Stromi-nen expressed concern with that option and stated it is a question of how <br />the City does business and it should not participate in "gray areas" around the law. <br />Councilmember Backous noted the price of this quote has already been stated into the record. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he values the legal opinion and agrees with the need for a second quote. <br />Councilmember Elvig suggested repackaging the project so it can be competitively bid since the <br />amount of the current quote is known. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated it can be bid for spring work or these items can be included <br />with Lot 5 to do the work. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated he does not advocate rebidding the project but to follow the <br />City Attorney's recommendation and seek a second quote in the market. <br />City Council Work Session / October 23, 2012 <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />