My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/19/86 Special Mtg
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1980's
>
1986
>
02/19/86 Special Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 1:55:00 PM
Creation date
11/10/2003 9:45:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission - Special
Document Date
02/19/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Reo~]eR~ For...Conditional Use Permit To Onerate Auto Body Rermir <br /> And Service Business In I-] InduRtr~a] D~str~;..ig~R~ °f~Mr. <br /> Charles Pearson~ <br /> <br />During the public hearing and Approval of Agenda, this case was tabled and <br />deleted from the agenda until further action is requested by Mr. Pearson. <br /> <br />~ Review~F]na] Draft. Of Recod]f]ed ~oning..Ord]nance? <br /> <br />Ms. Norris stated that after some research, the City Attorney has determined <br />that a condition of a conditional use permit can be a time limitation; <br />therefore, special use permits and tenporary conditional use permits are not <br />necessary and the recodified zoning ordinance has been adjusted accordingly. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that he is still of the opinion that there needs to <br />be a sunset clause in the ordinance regarding non-conforming uses that have <br />been grandfathered in so that eventually all non-conforming uses are controlled <br />by conditional use permits. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hendriksen disagreed on the basis that these particular property <br />owners have probably invested a great deal of money in designing buildings on <br />their property to accommodate the grandfathered use; if that use is disallowed, <br />the City has in essence devalued the property. <br /> <br />General discussion ensued and the Commission directed Ms. Norris to research <br />the manner in which the State Statute and other cities address the issue of <br />grandfathered non-conforming uses; Ms. Norris is to have this information <br />available for the regular Planning and Zoning meeting in March. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding fencing and screening requirenents and the <br />inconsistent use of the term 'opmgue' in the ordinance. <br /> <br />~he Commission amended the ordinance draft in the following ways: <br /> <br />1. R-IR Residential District - <br /> <br />Fences <br /> <br />Fencing other than for solely decorative purposes shall be restricted to <br />side and rear yards. Maximum fence heights shall be eight feet. <br /> <br />2. R-1U Residential, R-2U Residential, R-3U Residential, MR Multiple <br /> Residential - <br /> <br />Fences <br /> <br />Fencing other than for solely decorative purposes shall be restricted to <br />side and rear yards. Side and rear yard maximtm~ fence heights shall be <br />eight feet. <br /> <br />February 19, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.