My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/08/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/08/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:03:00 AM
Creation date
1/10/2013 1:37:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/08/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Work Session 3.2. <br />Meeting Date: 01/08/2013 <br />By: Shane Nelson, Engineering /Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Consider Feasibility Report for Riverdale Drive Extension <br />Background: <br />The City of Ramsey has received a $702,000 grant to help in the funding of the reconstruction and extension of <br />Riverdale Drive from Armstrong Blvd (CSAH83) to Traprock Street. The project is another step forward towards <br />readiness for an Armstrong Blvd (CSAH83) Interchange with TH10. The project also eliminates access to TH10 at <br />Alpaca Street and modifies access at Traprock Street. Those access changes are safety related and are a large <br />reason the grant was awarded to the City of Ramsey along with promotion of a south frontage road to TH10. The <br />$702,000 grant requires award of the contract by June 30th of 2013. <br />In conjunction with the road project, it is proposed that sanitary sewer and watermain be installed under the new <br />roadway consistent with the City's Comprehensive Water and Sewer Study's. Constructing the sanitary sewer and <br />watermain under the roadway now will prevent the road from being dug up at some point in the future to install the <br />utilities. <br />The attached feasibility report focuses on the cost of installing the utilities and discusses two alternatives for the <br />City to recapture the initial capital investment of installing the utilities. <br />Notification: <br />N/A <br />Observations: <br />The attached report analyzes two methods for recapturing the capital cost of the utilities. The first method, which <br />entirely utilizes connection charges to recapture the investment, is different than an assessment in several aspects, <br />as follows: <br />• The connection charge method utilizes a set rate(s) for connection to City utilities. In contrast, the <br />assessment method would utilize the actual lateral costs of the project plus the connection charges for the <br />trunk and other system facilities. <br />• A public improvement hearing and an assessment hearing are required for the assessment method. These <br />hearings are not required for the connection charge method. <br />• A mandatory 60 -day waiting period after the public improvement hearing is required by the City Charter for <br />the assessment method. The waiting period is not required for the connection charge method. <br />• With the assessment method, the property value increase of the properties being assessed must be greater <br />than or equal to the amount of the assessment. <br />• The assessment method does have a timing advantage, as the timetable is known for recapturing the <br />investment (typically 20 years for sewer and water) <br />Recommendation: <br />Upon consideration of several factors, staff recommends that the City utilize the connection charge method. <br />Funding Source: <br />The funding sources for this project are discussed within the attached report. <br />Council Action: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.