My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/31/2013 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/31/2013 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:17:22 AM
Creation date
1/25/2013 4:29:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special
Document Date
01/31/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin <br />October 10, 2012 I Volume 6 I Issue 19 <br />Use ubject to '"°egulation—Private <br />sanitary landfill's request for <br />rezoning is denied <br />Landfill owner then argues landfill is a public utility <br />exempt from local zoning regulation <br />Citation: Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Colerain Twp., 2012-Ohio-3914, <br />2012 WL 3848391 (Ohio 2012) <br />OHIO (09/05/12)—This case addressed the issue of whether a private <br />sanitary landfill is a public utility that is exempt from local zoning regulations <br />pursuant to state law. <br />The Background/Facts: Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. ("Rumpke") oper- <br />ated a sanitary landfill in Colerain Township in Hamilton County, Ohio (the <br />"Township"). In March 2006, Rumpke applied to change the existing zoning <br />of its property so that it could expand its landfill. The Hamilton County <br />Regional Planning Commission recommended the rezoning requested by <br />Rumpke. However, the Township's Zoning Commission recommended that <br />the Township Board of Trustees (hereinafter, the Township and the Township <br />Board of Trustees are collectively referred to as the "Township") deny the <br />proposed rezoning. Following public hearings, the Township denied Rumpke's <br />application. <br />Rumpke then filed a legal complaint against the Township. Among other <br />things, Rumpke asked the court to declare that Rumpke's private sanitary <br />landfill was a "public utility" exempt from zoning under Ohio statutory law, <br />R.C. 519.211. That statute sets forth limitations on zoning powers. It exempts <br />from local zoning restrictions, public utilities, "whether publicly or privately <br />owned," or the use of land by any public utility, for the operation of its <br />business. The statute does not define "public utility." <br />Finding there were no material issues of fact in dispute, and deciding the <br />matter on the law alone, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of <br />Rumpke. It held that Rumpke's sanitary landfill was a "public utility, not <br />subject to the zoning restrictions of [the Township]." <br />The Township appealed. And, the First District Court of Appeals also <br />declared that Rumpke was a public utility for the purposes of R.C. 519.211. <br />The Township again appealed. <br />DECISION: Judgment of court of appeals reversed. <br />The Supreme Court of Ohio held that "a private sanitary landfill is not a <br />public utility and is therefore subject to township zoning regulations." More <br />specifically, the court held that "a privately owned sanitary landfill cannot be a <br />common-law public utility exempt from township zoning when there is no <br />public regulation or oversight of its rates and charges, no statutory or regula- <br />tory requirement that all solid waste delivered to the landfill be accepted for <br />disposal, and no right of the public to demand and receive its services." <br />In so holding, since R.C. 519.211 did not define "public utility," the court <br />©2012 Thomson Reuters 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.