Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Executive Director Ulrich stated staff needs to clarify soft costs, such as engineering that <br />the HRA would have to absorb, prior to closing. He recommended the HRA act on development <br />fees separately instead of approving through a preliminary budget action. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated he has soft costs associated with modifying the legal <br />documents, easements, and plans but the hard costs will be held subject to closing with <br />SuperAmerica. <br />Motion by Commissioner Elvig, seconded by Commissioner Tossey, to approve the COR TWO <br />plat and initial improvements development scenario as outlined in the case report, and direct the <br />Development Team to proceed with the effort to assume the responsibilities related to the <br />development and construction of the initial improvements, subject to a spending cap of $40,000 <br />and hard costs contingent on planned closing with either Lot 3, Lot 4, or Lot 5. <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Ramsey noted the HRA has voted seven times to support <br />another project but not approved this one and it is now costing the HRA over $200,000 to fix due <br />to "public perception." Commissioner Elvig stated the HRA has the opportunity to earn back <br />that amount at the same time. Development Manager Lazan recommended the utility stubs be <br />included in the Sunwood Drive project, which would result in cost savings. Interim Engineer <br />Nelson stated the contractor is installing utilities in this location so the City could expand the <br />scope. Following a brief discussion of this option, City Attorney Goodrich advised it is a City <br />project and would not require a bidding process if under $100,000. Commissioner Strommen <br />asked the HRA to act on the motion on the floor since the issue of utility stubs is a Council <br />decision. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson McGlone, Commissioners Elvig, Tossey, Backous, <br />Ramsey, and Strommen. Voting No: None. Abstain: Commissioner Wise. <br />5.02: Approve Development Agreement — COR TWO <br />Development Manager Lazan reviewed the staff report. <br />Commissioner Strommen asked if this is also contingent on closing of other properties. <br />Development Manager Lazan explained it is not because the plat has to be recorded to dedicate <br />the rights -of -way for Armstrong Boulevard and completion of the grant preparation. He stated if <br />a closing is delayed, the projects could be deferred. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill advised the time deadline is one year upon approval to <br />complete the improvements and the HRA can also consider an extension, if needed. <br />Commissioner Strommen asked if the Council also needs to approve the development agreement. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill noted the Council had approved it subject to review as <br />to legal form. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / October 16, 2012 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />