My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 02/12/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:06:34 AM
Creation date
2/13/2013 1:02:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/12/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
844
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 02/12/2013 <br />By: Colleen Lasher, Administrative Services <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #13-02-032 to Hire Patrol Officer <br />4. 14. <br />Background: <br />At the January 22, 2013 Personnel Committee meeting, the Committee unanimously recommended that the City <br />Council authorize staff to recruit for a Patrol Officer from the recent recruitment held in the Fall. Action on this <br />case is documented within the Report from the Personnel Committee on tonight's consent agenda. <br />In an effort to be as efficient as possible and expedite the hiring process, staff is bringing the "Authorization to Hire <br />a Patrol Officer" case directly to the City Council for action tonight. It is important to note, this position is not a <br />new position, but rather to fill the vacancy left by the Patrol Officer as described below under "Notifications". <br />As anticipated, staff has successfully advanced Mr. Cory Gardner in the Patrol Officer recruitment process. Mr. <br />Gardner has accepted the City's contingent offer and has passed all of the necessary pre -employment testing. With <br />the City Council's authorization, Mr. Gardner will be be hired on or near February 28, 2013. He will be subject to a <br />1-year probationary period and all other personnel policies will apply normally. <br />Notification: <br />The following information is an excerpt from the case presented to the Personnel Committee on January 22, 2013: <br />Changes to the department's staffing of Patrol Officers (during 2012) include, one officer out on an unpaid <br />extended leave of absence, one officer that resigned and one officer that retired as part of the City's Voluntary Early <br />Separation program. The opening left by the resignation was filled in November; however, the number of officers <br />currently available to provide the City with 24-hour protection is still down by two officers. Twenty-four hour <br />protection consists of a minimum of two officers working at all times. During peak times there may be up to four <br />officers on duty. Officers work a rotation of five days on duty, five days off, then two days on and two days off. <br />There are four officers assigned to work 6:30 am to 6:30 pm each day as well as four officers working 6:30 pm to <br />6:30 am. <br />It is anticipated that the officer on unpaid extended leave of absence will not be in a position to return to work. The <br />absence of the Patrol Officer is taking its toll on the department by reducing scheduling flexibility, reducing <br />officers' ability to use vacation time, and creates a liability for the department in the event that another officer <br />would require an unplanned leave. <br />In order to fill our last vacancy, a Patrol Officer recruitment was last held in the Fall, resulting in the receipt of 140 <br />applications. Staff held 15 first interviews and 4 candidates were interviewed a second time. In addition to the <br />interview process, candidates were required to pass a report writing exercise and a physical agility test. The top 4 <br />candidates were required to pass a "shoot / don't shoot" exercise. <br />Drawing upon the recent Patrol Officer recruitment file, staff feels confident that the next highest scoring candidate <br />would be a good fit for the department. Or, at the very least, there are additional viable candidates left in the 125 <br />remaining applicants that were not interviewed. <br />Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.