Laserfiche WebLink
CASE ~12: Health and Life Insurance for 1991 <br /> <br />Ms. McAloney explained the case as presented to the Personnel <br />Committee In November and the LOGIS plan seemed to be the most <br />logical. It was submitted to the Council. Since then new <br />information has become available. Due to changes in the LOGIS <br />policy, if the coverage is extended to regular part-time employees, <br />the City of Ramsey must contribute 50 to 75 percent of the <br />insurance premium cost, which would result in an additional cost to <br />the City of $700 to $1,300 per year per regular part-time employee. <br />At thls time, there is only one part-time employee; however, it <br />would apply to every part-time employee hired in the future whether <br />they needed it or not. She recommended approving the 1991 health <br />and life insurance with LOGIS for full-time, benefit-earning <br />employees only. <br /> <br />MOTION by DeLuGa.~$econded by Pearson, adopting Resolution <br /> ~--~0-/-{2-375 h~~t%~ I ife insurance through Local Government <br />Information Systems (LOGIS) for benefit-earning employees. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />CASE #13: Consider Employment Agreement of City Administrator <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley submitted his letter of resignation which is contingent <br />upon approval of a Resolution granting him three months severance <br />pay. He stated he believes this is in the best interest of the <br />City. <br /> <br />Attorney Goodrich advised the Statute allows a City to grant <br />severance pay for up to one year. In reviewing Mr. Hart]ey's <br />Employment Agreement, which is for the years 1990 and 1991, if the <br />Council wanted to dismiss him, he would have to be paid a one-year <br />increment. It was his opinion that it may be a benefit to the City <br />to pay the three-month increment rather than one year of severance <br />pay if the new Council would dismiss him. <br /> <br />MOTION by Cich, Seconded by Pearson. to ~0~Resolution ~90-12- <br /> <br /> FURTHER DISCUSSION: Councilmember Pearson hated to <br />see Mr. Hartley leave, feeling there was a good working <br />relationship and that he had done a fine 3ob for the City. <br /> <br />Doug Fountain - stated as a representative of the community, he <br />ls sorry to see Mr. Hartley leave, stating Mr. Hartley did a <br />wonderful job. He thanked hlm for his services. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: Carried unanimously, <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL/DECEMBER 11, 1990 <br /> Page 16 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />