Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember DeLuca introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #89-12-341 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION AFFIRMING CITY POLICY AND SIGNIFICANCE AS TO <br />RURAL AREA PUD APPROVAL <br /> <br /> WItEREAS, pursuant to Section 170.016K various landowners and Developers <br />have applied for rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PUD site (concept) approval; <br />and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, thc Council desires that thc record clearly indicate the significance <br />of its granting rezoning to PUD and preliminary concept approval for a PUD. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br /> 1) That pursuant to Paragraph 10 of Section I70.016K of the PUD section, "If <br />the application for rezoning (to PUD District) is approved, the City Council ,qhall approve or <br />modify and approve the preliminary site plan". (emphasis added) <br /> <br /> 2) That "Preliminary Concept Approval" signifies the City's acceptance of the <br />PUD site plan as the term "Prelim/nary Site Plan Approval" is used in Section 170.016K of the <br />City Code. <br /> <br /> 3) That Preliminary Site Plan Approval does not preclude further consideration <br />by the City and directions to the Developer relating to such subjects as lot size, lot density, park <br />dedication, open space requirements, open space ownership and the necessity of a homeowners <br />association, in addition to all other development issues to be considered as directed by Chapter <br />170.015K. <br /> <br /> 4) That each lot approved for inclusion within a PUD shall be required to have <br />a minimum of 27,225 square feet of Class I lands as defined by the City's Soils chapter, Chapter <br />170.04 of the City Code. The purpose of said requirement is to insure the integrity of ground <br />water quality by requiring adequate soils for on-site septic systems. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Pearson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann <br />Councilmember DeLuca <br />Counciknember Pearson <br />Councilmember Cich <br />Councilmember Peterson <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />