Laserfiche WebLink
All three recently made inquiries will require Planning Commission review and Council approval. At this point, no <br />official direction or motions are required by the EDA. However, being the viability of this node is a priority of the <br />EDA, Staff would like to provide an opportunity for the EDA to discuss and give general guidance. <br />OPTIONS: <br />1. Provide Support as Needed [STAFF RECOMMENDATION] . <br />Staff recommends that the EDA remain in a supportive role to the Planning Commission and City Council and <br />monitor the progress of the three potential users that have currently expressed interest in the area. Based on said <br />outcome, the EDA will likely be in a better position to determine if additional involvement shall be necessary. Staff <br />further recommends that the EDA support a zoning amendment if requested by the Property Owner after analysis of <br />compatibility with the surrounding area. <br />Staff recommends this option because the issuance of a CUP or zoning amendment are functions of the Planning <br />Commission and subsequently the City Council. In the event new users begin occupation and/or the node is <br />rezoned, the level of involvement by the EDA may change in scope; thus allowing EDA staff to focus resources on <br />other projects. Irregardless, Staff is interested in the types of land uses the EDA would find acceptable for the area. <br />2. Pro Active Measures; which could include a number of options: <br />- -Lead Redevelopment (pursue purchase of land, potentially use TIF, consider extension of utilities, etc.) <br />- -Master Planning (formal planning process, visioning, etc.) <br />- -Pursue zoning amendment now <br />EDA Action: <br />No action is being requested at this time. This case has been prepared as an update to recent discussions and <br />provide an opportunity for additional feedback. <br />Attachments <br />Buxton One <br />Retail Market Analysis <br />TIF <br />Water Main <br />Buxton Two <br />Buxton Three <br />Buxton Four <br />Fact Sheet <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill Tim Gladhill 01/04/2013 02:53 PM <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 01/04/2013 03:47 PM <br />Form Started By: Patrick Brama Started On: 01/02/2013 <br />Final Approval Date: 01/04/2013 <br />