Laserfiche WebLink
City Administrator Ulrich stated a proposal was received for an engineering study on the <br />intersection of Highway 47 and CSAH 116 in light of Anoka County's policy of closing down <br />access points at intersections and concerns expressed by local businesses of having their access <br />closed. He stated the City reached agreement with the County that if open median cuts or <br />additional access cuts are to be considered, an engineering study is needed to determine that <br />traffic can be accommodated and businesses kept open. He advised the City received a proposal <br />from WSB & Associates for approximately $24,000 to study the intersection and noted that the <br />City of Anoka would pay for half of the cost of the study. He stated the City Council reviewed <br />the proposal on December 11, 2012, and voiced concern primarily regarding the potential that <br />Mn/DOT might require the closure of additional access points. He stated the City Council <br />referenced in particular the access at 142nd Street, which intersects with a State Highway and <br />questioned the need to spend money on this study. He indicated the City Council did not <br />approve the study and directed staff to meet with Mn/DOT to discuss the possibility of additional <br />access closures. He also recommended that the EDA take no action on this item today. <br />Member McGlone stated his opinion that this issue should be addressed at the legislative level <br />and did not feel the City should spend money on an engineering study. <br />Motion by Member Williams, seconded by Member Skaff, to take no action regarding the <br />proposed engineering study pending further action by the City Council. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members Williams, Skaff, LeTourneau, <br />McGlone, and Steffen. Voting No: None. Absent: Member Wise. <br />4.02: Business Retention Program Update <br />Management Analyst Brama explained that staff compiled a list of 50 businesses and <br />approximately 25 businesses responded that they were interested in a visit with City staff. He <br />stated that 14 business visits have been completed, four visits are currently scheduled, and 2-5 <br />visits are pending. He indicated that overall, the visits were positive and well received and a <br />number of businesses stated their appreciation for this initiative by the EDA. He noted that a <br />number of businesses have asked to keep their information confidential; as a result, the monthly <br />written update provided to the EDA will not contain public information. He indicated that three <br />businesses have expressed an interest in expanding in the City and 14 businesses indicated they <br />expect to expand their business in the coming years. He stated that a lot of follow-up was <br />requested from the businesses and staff will continue working with the businesses to address <br />their concerns and answer their questions. He stated after all the initial visits are completed, staff <br />will provide the EDA with an executive report. He reminded the EDA about the Life Fitness <br />tour and business visit on Thursday, January 10, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. and encouraged the EDA to <br />attend. He added that the EDA is welcome to attend any of the business visits. <br />Member Skaff advised he attended the business visit at Allina and Allina representatives <br />indicated they have an issue with their building's signage on Ramsey Boulevard and Sunwood. <br />He stated Allina has posted a 4x4 banner in their lawn because the building has no signage on <br />that corner. He indicated they talked about how to help them increase their visibility and the <br />Allina representative expressed gratitude for meeting with them. <br />Economic Development Authority/December 13, 2012 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />