My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 03/12/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 03/12/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:11:11 AM
Creation date
3/13/2013 8:56:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Meaning, the City would not yield a full built out potential for several years. <br />In order to insure proposed scenarios were realistic for the market, Staff reviewed with builders (Mortenson and <br />Kraus Anderson), real estate agents (CBRE), Greater MSP (regional economic development agency), the State of <br />Minnesota (Department of Employment and Economic Development), the City's economic development consultant <br />(Mike Mulrooney) and the City's planning consultant (Stantec). <br />With the information above in mind, Staff developed the attached cost/benefit analysis. Said analysis renders a <br />number of conclusions. Staff reviewed this information in detail at the February EDA meeting and intends to <br />provide the City Council with a brief overview. Below is a summary of conclusions: <br />(1) From an annual cash flow prospective (City of Ramsey only), data center developments scenarios result <br />in a significantly higher general tax revenue stream than does a residential development. 1 Data Center = <br />$276,742, 2 Data Center = $223,714, Residential = $28,263 <br />(2) From a one time land transaction scenario perspective, a residential development scenario results in a <br />higher return for the City. Data Centers = 0- $500,000, Residential $1,000,000. <br />(3) Considering the City's strategic plan of using revenues from the Subject Property to pay for a new fire <br />station, Staff would conclude data center scenarios provide a stronger and more complete financial solution <br />than does a residential development. See fire station attachment (updated). <br />NOTE: Staff updated fire station analysis. The original fire stati analysis was an in house draft estimate. The <br />new updated analysis includes market input data from the City's financial consultant, Northland Securities. <br />Moving Forward: <br />Zoning <br />If the EDA and City Council decide they would like to move forward with pursuit of a data center development, the <br />next step in this process is zoning. As it stands today, the Subject Property is located within the Public /Quasi <br />Public Zoning District. A Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment would need to be approved to allow for a <br />data center user. Staff would ask the EDA and City Council for direction to begin this process by engaging <br />surrounding property owners via an open house. Then, Staff will report findings from said open house; and, <br />develop a proposed zoning and long range planning solution for consideration by the EDA and City Council. <br />Recognized Environmental Conditions <br />As a result of the Shovel Ready certification process, three "recognized environmental conditions" were identified <br />on the Subject Property by Braun Inertec (environmental services contractor). In order to clear said "recognized <br />environmental conditions" from the property, they would need to be tested. Meaning, additional soil borings would <br />need to be attained and reviewed. Staff will bring back a request for proposals (RFP) for said service at the April <br />EDA meeting. <br />Funding Source: <br />NA <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />A number of options exist as the EDA considers the development of the Subject Property: <br />(1) Move forward with pursuing a data center user(s) [STAFF RECOMMENDATION] <br />Considering the attached cost/benefit analysis, pursing option 1 makes financial sense for the City, and may <br />still fall generally within future land use plans and compatibility with surrounding land uses. Additionally, <br />this development provides a solution to finance the City's new fire station. Aside from the financial aspect of <br />this review, the only foreseeable drawback of this development is a potential negative reaction from the <br />public relative to land use planning. The unknown variable of public feedback is part of Staffs <br />recommendation of an open house to complete the land use analysis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.