Laserfiche WebLink
LAND APPRAISAL REPORT <br />Page #31 <br />WINDSORWOODL <br />File No. 12SEP19D <br />Borrower n/a Census Tract 0502.24 Map Reference 34 C2 <br />Property Address Unassigned <br />o City Ramsey County Anoka State MN Zip Code 55303 <br />Legal Description Lot 9, Block 2 Windsorwood, subj to ease of record <br />Sale Price $ n/a Date of Sale n/a Loan Term n/a yrs. Property Rights Appraised / / Fee ❑ Leasehold De Minimis PUD <br />w Actual Real Estate Taxes $ exempt (yr) Loan charges to be paid by seller $ n/a Other sales concessions n/a <br />o Lender/Client City of Ramsey Address 7550 Sunwood Dr NW, Ramsey, MN 55303 <br />Occupant vacant Appraiser David C. Hughes Instructions to Appraiser Estimate the fair market value of an unimproved site <br />located in Windsorwood Lot 9, Block 2, in the city of Ramsey in Anoka County. <br />Location Urban ❑ Suburban @ Rural <br />Built Up • Over 75% ® 25% to 75% Under 25% <br />Growth Rate ❑ Fully Dev. ❑ Rapid ❑ Steady ® Slow <br />Property Values ❑ Increasing ® Stable ❑ Declining <br />Demand/Supply /1 Shortage ❑ In Balance • Oversupply <br />Marketing Time Under 3 Mos. ® 4-6 Mos. • Over 6 Mos. <br />,, Present Land Use 85% 1 Family 00% 2-4 Family % Apts. % Condo 10% Commercial <br />o % Industrial % Vacant 05% vacant <br />Good Avg. Fair Poor <br />Employment Stability • ® ❑ • <br />Convenience to Employment ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />Convenience to Shopping ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />Convenience to Schools • ® ❑ • <br />Adequacy of Public Transportation • ® ❑ • <br />Recreational Facilities • ® ❑ • <br />Adequacy of Utilities • ® ❑ • <br />o Change in Present Land Use ❑ Not Likely ❑ Likely (*) ® Taking Place (*) <br />(*) From public -quasi -public To residential <br />Property Compatibility ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />Protection from Detrimental Conditions ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />zPredominant Occupancy / / Owner ❑ Tenant 5 % Vacant <br />Police and Fire Protection • ® ❑ • <br />Single Family Price Range $ 30,000 to $ 655,000 Predominant Value $ 160 <br />General Appearance of Properties • ® ❑ • <br />Single Family Age 00 yrs. to 70 yrs. Predominant Age 18 yrs. <br />Appeal to Market • ® ❑ • <br />Comments including those factors, favorable or unfavorable, affecting marketability (e.g. public parks, schools, view, noise):Subject is located in Ramsey, an area <br />consisting of single family homes of various styles, sizes, ages and values. Schools are in the Elk River School District. Ramsey has limited <br />employment opportunities. Recreation (primarily outdoor) and police and fire protection are adequate. No adverse noise factor, typical nature and <br />residential views. <br />Dimensions 153x315x393x523x133 = 3.10 Sq. Ft. or Acres , Corner Lot <br />Zoning classification R1 - Single Family Residential Present Improvements ® do ❑ do not conform to zoning regulations <br />Highest and best use @ Present use ❑ Other (specify) site is currently un-improved, highest and best use is improved SFR <br />Public Other (Describe) <br />OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS <br />Topo basically level <br />Elec. @ <br />Street Access @ Public ❑ Private <br />Size conforms to area <br />Gas @ <br />Surface bituminous <br />Shape irregular <br />cWater <br />Maintenance , Public ❑ Private <br />View nature/res <br />San. Sewer ❑ <br />❑ Storm Sewer ❑ Curb/Gutter <br />Drainage runoff to ditch & culvert <br />❑ Underground Elect. & Tel <br />❑ Sidewalk ❑ Street Lights <br />Is the property located in a HUD Identified Special Flood Hazard Area? , No ❑ Yes <br />Comments (favorable or unfavorable including any apparent adverse easements, encroachments, or other adverse conditions). The subject site does not appear to be in a FEMA <br />designated flood zone. No adverse easements, encroachments or any other adverse conditions were noted by the appraiser. The subject is a <br />garden level vacant lot of a developed subdivision. <br />The undersigned has recited three recent sales of properties most similar and proximate to subject and has considered these in the market analysis. The description includes a dollar <br />adjustment reflecting market reaction to those items of significant variation between the subject and comparable properties. If a significant item in the comparable property is superior <br />to or more favorable than the subject property, a minus (-) adjustment is made thus reducing the indicated value of subject if a significant item in the comparable is inferior to or less <br />favorable than the subject property, a plus (+) adjustment is made thus increasing the indicated value of the subject. <br />ITEM I SUBJECT PROPERTY <br />COMPARABLE NO. 1 <br />COMPARABLE NO. 2 <br />COMPARABLE NO. 3 <br />Address Unassigned 178th Ave NW <br />Ramsey, 55303, Anoka Cnty <br />xxx25 Iman Ave NW <br />Elk River, 55330, Anoka Cnty <br />xxx27 Iman Ave NW <br />Elk River, 55330, Anoka Cnty <br />xxxx 222nd Ave NW <br />Nowthen, MN 55330 <br />Proximity to Subject <br />1.44 miles NW <br />1.49 miles NW <br />5.61 miles N <br />ct Sales Price <br />$ n/a <br />$ 52,250 <br />$ 52,500 <br />$ 25,000 <br />Price <br />$ <br />$ 17,131/ac <br />$ 20,834/ac <br />$ 7,716/ac <br />,, Data Source <br />inspect/county <br />County/RealtorMLS <br />County/RealtorMLS <br />a Date of Sale and <br />o Time Adjustment <br />DESCRIPTION <br />DESCRIPTION <br />+(—)$ Adjust. <br />DESCRIPTION <br />+(— )$ Adjust <br />DESCRIPTION <br />+(—)$ Adjust. <br />n/a <br />05/12 dom 1,304 <br />05/12 dom 206 <br />09/12 dom 1 <br />Y Location <br />Ramsey <br />Nowthen <br />Nowthen <br />Nowthen <br />+2,500 <br />Q SiteAtiew <br />3.1 a., comer/res <br />3.05 a., comer/res <br />0 <br />2.52 a., interior/res <br />+2,500 <br />3.24 a.,cor/pd <br />-2,500 <br />wooded <br />open <br />open <br />open <br />open <br />topography <br />IeveVlookout <br />IeveVlookout <br />IeveVlookout <br />rolling/walkout <br />-2,500 <br />utilities <br />ng/eVtele <br />ng/eVtele <br />ng/eVtele <br />Ip/eVtele <br />+2,500 <br />appeal <br />average <br />average <br />average <br />average <br />Sales or Financing <br />Concessions <br />n/a <br />Cash <br />Conventional <br />other <br />'reo' <br />+2,500 <br />NetAdj. (Total) <br />❑ + ❑ - $ <br />/1 + ■ — $ 2,500 <br />®+ ❑ - $ 2,500 <br />Indicated Value <br />of Subject <br />$ 52,250 <br />$ 55,000 <br />$ 27,500 <br />Comments on Market Data: See General Text Addendum <br />Comments and Conditions of Appraisal: The subject has not been sold within the last three years. No other previous sales were noted within the last one <br />year for any of the comparable sales used in this report. <br />0 <br />a <br />d Final Reconciliation: The income and cost approaches to value were not used due to the lack of sufficient data with which to form a meaningful value <br />o estimate. The direct sales comparison approach is deemed to offer the most reliable indication of value. The final value is rounded up to the nearest <br />$1,000 influenced by the adjusted values of comparables one and two. <br />I ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS DEFINED, OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AS OF September 19, 2012 to be $ 49,000 <br />David C. Hughes ❑ Did Did Not Physically Inspect Property <br />Appraiser(s) Review Appraiser (f applicable) <br />[UK] <br />Hughes Appraisal Services <br />Form LND — "WinTOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc.— 1-800-ALAMODE <br />