My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/12/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 03/12/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:10:54 AM
Creation date
3/13/2013 9:04:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/12/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Waive the standard application fee and a portion of the required escrow fee. This option, which Staff recommends, <br />seems most reasonable. Regardless of whether the existence of this easement was discovered during the initial Site <br />Plan review process (by either the City or the Applicant) or at some later date, there are still certain hard <br />costs incurred to vacate it. Specifically, the hard costs associated with vacating an easement relate to the Public <br />Hearing (publishing the notice in the local paper [460.00] and postage for mailings [—$10.001) and recording fees <br />(—$50.00). The City could assume responsibility for the soft costs incurred while processing this request, which <br />would principally be staff time. <br />It should be noted that this same street and utility easement extends across Lot 2 Block 1 Park 67 Industrial Park, <br />which is owned by Park 67, LLC. Staff will be attempting to contact that property owner as well regarding this <br />matter. If there are no encroachments, then that property owner may choose whether they would prefer to have this <br />easement vacated (would be beneficial in 'cleaning up' the title work if nothing else). However, if there are any <br />encroachments, such as with structures and/or parking, the easement would need to be vacated. Staff believes that <br />whatever action is given by City Council regarding Mr. Sharp's request to waive fees should also be applicable to <br />Lot 2 as well. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff would recommend waiving the standard application fee and a portion of the standard escrow fee for <br />processing an Easement Vacation. The collected escrow would be used for all costs the City is charged for <br />including, but not necessarily limited to, publishing a Notice of Public Hearing in the Anoka Union newspaper, <br />postage for the Public Hearing mailings to properties within 350 feet of the Subject Property, and the recording fee <br />to record the Ordinance, assuming it is ultimately approved by City Council. <br />Funding Source: <br />The request to consider waiving fees is being handled as part of regular Staff duties. <br />Council Action: <br />Motion to waive the standard application fee and half of the required escrow fee for an Easement Vacation request, <br />requiring that the Applicant pay for all hard costs incurred by the City including, but not limited to, public hearing <br />fees, mailing fees, copying charges, and recording fees, but not require the Applicant to be charged for City Staff <br />time to process the request. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Easement Exhibit <br />Quit Claim Deed <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill Tim Gladhill 03/05/2013 02:33 PM <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 03/06/2013 03:42 PM <br />Form Started By: Chris Anderson Started On: 03/01/2013 03:19 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 03/06/2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.