10/02/90 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilm~.her Cox moved ~he adoption of the follmeing findings of fact: FI~DL~CS O! FACT 90166 ¢ONDITIOHAL USE FERHIT. DUAHE A~D BO~qLE LUNDKK~ 6710 HICH~AY ~10 1T~ 1) That Duane and Bonnie Lundeen, hereinafter referred to as the "Applicants", have properly applied for a conditional use permit to construct and operate a residential use in the B-1 Business District. That the Applicants appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission for a public hearing pursuant to Section 170.013D of the City Code on May 5, 1987 and that said public hearing vas properly advertised and the minutes of that public hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. 3) That the subject property is generally known as 6710 Highway ~I0 NW and is legally described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1, Riverside West, Anoka County, Minnesota That the subject property is approximately 1.1 acres in size. That the subject property is located in the B-1 Business District and permitted uses in this district include uses such as wholesale, retail, restaurants, offices, etc. That the Applicants are proposing to construct a 2,400 square foot addition to the existing structure and that the ground floor will be an expansion of the restaurant and the upper story is proposed to be used for residential purposes. 7) That the expansion of the restaurant is a permitted use in the B-1 Business District. 8) That a residential use is not a permitted use in the B-1 Business District. 9) That the applicants are requesting a conditional use permit for the residential use. 10) That the Applicants have stated that the residential use is necessary for security.purposes.. 11) That the adjoining properties are used and zoned for B-1 Business. 12) That there are no other similar permitted conditional uses; that is, a residential use in the B-1 Business District. 13) That the proposed residential use would have no significant impact on traffic to the premises. 14) That the proposed residential use will not substantially adversely impair the use of surrounding properties. 15) That the proposed residential use is not in accordance with specific objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan.