My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/03/89
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
01/03/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 8:52:01 AM
Creation date
11/13/2003 2:31:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
01/03/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case #4 Review sketch Dian Oak Run Addition, <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Hetland and seconded by Commissioner Rustad to accept 10% of the fair <br />market value as park dedication. <br /> <br />Ivlotion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Lichter, Commissioner Prall, Rustad, Hetiand, Johnson <br />and Lokker. Voting No: None. Absent: CommissionerShumway. <br /> <br />_Case #5 R{~view Park concept plan~ for North Fork Addition. <br /> <br />Dennis Peck told the Commission that he was the director for North Fork. He told lhe <br />Commission that North Fork agrced to supply 30 acres lor park dedication with access to a trail <br />corridor. He also told the Commission that he would be coming in January with that <br />preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Terry Hendricksen told the Commission that he feels it would convey a poor message for North <br />Fork to have a private trail going through it. <br /> <br />Dennis Peck told Mr. Hendricksen and 1he Commission that the people North Fork are attracting <br />are more interested in the golf course ralher than the trail system. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hetland asked Mr. Peck if the golf course was going to be privately owned. <br /> <br />Dennis Peck told the Commission yes it was going to be privately owned but it will be open to the <br />public. <br /> <br />Case #6 Review combined Cedar Hill AdditionfWindemere Woods <br /> <br />Addition/Chestnut Hills Addition parks concept plan. <br /> <br />Greg Frank of M.F.R.A. told the Commission that he talked to the three developers and that they <br />know the City wants a minimum of 8 acres of dry land for park dedication. He told the <br />Commission that they have come up with an area that has 13.5 acres with the minimum 8 acres <br />of dry land. <br /> <br />Merland Otto told the Commission that this is the first time he has heard of this concept and that <br />he would like to know if the developers want credit for park dedication on the full 13.5 acres of <br />land. <br /> <br />John Peterson of Good Value Homes told the Commission that he does not think they expect credit <br />for the 5 acres of wet land. <br /> <br />Merland Otto told the Commission that this overall concept fits the needs of the City better than <br />the first one. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Commission was to accept the overall concept along with a trail to the north <br />but not to make a motion for acceptance until the Commission receives a revised plat showing <br />the entire area of the 3 developments, all the trail alignments and public use areas. <br /> PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION/DECEMBER 8, 1988 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.