Laserfiche WebLink
Case #4: <br /> <br /> STREET LIGHTS AS SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENT <br />By: Mark S. Banwart, Community Development Director <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />From time to time, citizens have commented to the City that there is a need for street lights. This concern has been <br />re-emphasized with developments such as the higher density Flintwood Hills Additions. In response to the City's <br />charge to address issues of public health, welfare, and safety; the City Staff has received a excerpt from the City of <br />Coon Rapids Subdivision Ordinance, which addresses street lights as a requirement of a subdivision developer. Thc <br />following is the excerpt: <br /> <br />Street Lights: Street lights meeting City standards and specifications shall be installed (by the developer) <br />at all interior street intersections within the subdivision. Such lights shall also be installed on all interior <br />streets within the subdivision at points designated by the City Engineer. The point shall be approximately <br />250 feet apart on residential streets and approximately 400 feet on collector streets. S~eet lights required <br />on streets bordering a plat shall be installed pursuant to Section 11-2252 (4) (A). Street lights shall be <br />installed along existing streets within 90 days of the filing of the plat or within 90 days of the completion <br />of the construction of the streets. If the streets are completed or the plat filed between November 1 and <br />April 1, the 90 day time period for installation of the required street lights shall commence on the <br />following April 1. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />Since there are a number of rather large subdivisions currently in review and approval process (e.g., Cedar Hills, <br />Windemere Woods, Chesmut Hills, etc.); this may be an opportune time to establish street light installation as a <br />subdivision requirement. It will be much easier to require the street lights as a pan of the development agreement <br />and platting process rather than retrofitting a street lighting scheme, probably at the City's expense, in the future. <br />The issue of street lighting addresses both a public safety concern, particularly intersections, and the City's focus on <br />an improved City image. On January 3, 1989, the Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission directed City staff to <br />research standards and costs for installing street lights in existing and newly developing areas and the amount of <br />lighting that would adequately address safety issues. Further directed was that a survey be taken via the Ram~ey <br />Resident to determine citizen recommendations regarding street lighting. <br /> <br />Recommendations: <br /> <br />City Staff is receiving a steady flow of survey responses from residents regarding the questionaire in the January <br />issue of the Ramsey Resident. To allow adequate time for residents to respond to the survey, we recommend that <br />this issue of street lights be tabled until the March Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Commission Action: <br />Commission action will be based upon discussion. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />City Administrator Chief of Police <br />City Attorney Finance Officer <br />City Engineer X Planning & Zoning Commission . X <br />Community Development Director X Parks & Recreation Commission <br /> <br /> <br />