Laserfiche WebLink
Ramsey Final Report <br />Grant No. 05 -1237 <br />City of Ramsey <br />In the end, the group concluded that Ramsey needed a combination of these approaches to avoid <br />something too proscriptive and inflexible. <br />What they favored was a "smorgasbord" approach that took from the best of each of the new alternative <br />zoning ideas and applied them to parts of the city where they might best work. For example, a New <br />Urbanist development might be appropriate in some area of the City but not necessary in all. In <br />articulating this, the group affirmed the transect concept that is gaining much attention among planners. <br />Ramsey may prove a particularly fertile ground for this concept because we range from the New <br />Urbanist concept of the Town Center to the rural farming areas north of Trott Brook. <br />Review By a Larger Group of Citizens Using OST. <br />In a three -hour evening session lead by Michael Herman Ramsey invited all citizens to attend an OST <br />session to review the draft vision document drawn up by the Work Group. Most of those attending this <br />session had attended one of the earlier OST sessions held the previous summer, reinforcing that this <br />method of collaborative decision - making is one trusted by citizens because it is citizen lead. <br />Herman began the session by having the Work Group review what it had accomplished and presenting <br />the draft to them. A "library table" at the rear of the room also contained preliminary drafts from the <br />Work Group sessions as well as key City documents such as the current Comprehensive Plan, City Code <br />Book, and a map of the city. A staff member served as a resource for the "library" for those who had <br />questions. Because of experiences the previous summer when citizens sometimes used this as an <br />opportunity to address personal issues not related to OST session, citizens were asked to defer these <br />questions to discuss with staff privately. <br />Herman then "opened the space" to those who wished to raise issues or comment on the draft document. <br />Two of these sessions were held within the three -hour time limit. <br />At the conclusion of the evening the entire group met to review the draft document and comment about <br />the issues raised. Perhaps the most gratifying aspect of this final evening was the dramatic change from <br />a year ago. While there were still differences among participants, the atmosphere of the session was one <br />- 19 - <br />Mandated <br />New Urbanism <br />Neighborhood, high <br />standards <br />Can be expensive <br />Community, walkability <br />Elitist <br />Place, amenities <br />More restrictive <br />More restrictive <br />No space for boat /toys <br />More planful- <br />efficiency/benefits <br />Need to be planful /takes <br />effort <br />Can be used w /conventional <br />development <br />Form -based Codes <br />Emphasis on form <br />Requires up front work <br />Could be part of PUD <br />Too rigid to accommodate <br />underlying changes <br />Ramsey Final Report <br />Grant No. 05 -1237 <br />City of Ramsey <br />In the end, the group concluded that Ramsey needed a combination of these approaches to avoid <br />something too proscriptive and inflexible. <br />What they favored was a "smorgasbord" approach that took from the best of each of the new alternative <br />zoning ideas and applied them to parts of the city where they might best work. For example, a New <br />Urbanist development might be appropriate in some area of the City but not necessary in all. In <br />articulating this, the group affirmed the transect concept that is gaining much attention among planners. <br />Ramsey may prove a particularly fertile ground for this concept because we range from the New <br />Urbanist concept of the Town Center to the rural farming areas north of Trott Brook. <br />Review By a Larger Group of Citizens Using OST. <br />In a three -hour evening session lead by Michael Herman Ramsey invited all citizens to attend an OST <br />session to review the draft vision document drawn up by the Work Group. Most of those attending this <br />session had attended one of the earlier OST sessions held the previous summer, reinforcing that this <br />method of collaborative decision - making is one trusted by citizens because it is citizen lead. <br />Herman began the session by having the Work Group review what it had accomplished and presenting <br />the draft to them. A "library table" at the rear of the room also contained preliminary drafts from the <br />Work Group sessions as well as key City documents such as the current Comprehensive Plan, City Code <br />Book, and a map of the city. A staff member served as a resource for the "library" for those who had <br />questions. Because of experiences the previous summer when citizens sometimes used this as an <br />opportunity to address personal issues not related to OST session, citizens were asked to defer these <br />questions to discuss with staff privately. <br />Herman then "opened the space" to those who wished to raise issues or comment on the draft document. <br />Two of these sessions were held within the three -hour time limit. <br />At the conclusion of the evening the entire group met to review the draft document and comment about <br />the issues raised. Perhaps the most gratifying aspect of this final evening was the dramatic change from <br />a year ago. While there were still differences among participants, the atmosphere of the session was one <br />- 19 - <br />