Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 03/19/2013 <br />By: Grant Riemer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Review AVL System and Consider Purchase <br />Background: <br />The use of an Automatic Vehicle Locator System (AVL) for our plow equipment was first brought up in May 2012 <br />as a way of gathering plowing information to relay to residents, as well as tracking salt usage and other factors in <br />our plowing operation. Public Works has been testing the Precise MRM (mobile resourse management)system <br />in our sweeping operation, as well as one of our plow trucks starting in the fall of 2012. The system collects data <br />from the equipment and transmits that data back to an Internet website over a cellular network. The information is <br />always being collected, but the transmittal rate is determined by the end user. During snow storms or emergency <br />situations you would want the information more readily available to make maintenance decisions, such as what <br />vehicle could respond quicker or suppling route completion information to residents or council. During mowing or <br />sweeping operations gathering data once per day would be sufficient. <br />Besides route information and vehicle location the software has the potential to provide other useful information <br />that can be used in our operation. Vehicle maintenance intervals can be loaded into the program and <br />tracked through the software, with alerts being issued once trigger points are reached. The biggest advantage of the <br />software would be the ability to track salt usage more closely. Even a 5% reduction in salt use would pay for the <br />capitol investment in the first year and give us information that would allow us to fine tune our application rates <br />system wide. Effective use of salt is one way we can lower our operating expenses, as well as protect the <br />environment. Staff will present a short power point presentation on the Precise MRM System and show some <br />examples of data collected off our demo truck. <br />Notification: <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Alternative # 1 Continue to operate PW equipment without AVL software (not recommend) <br />Pros: City would save the initial hardware cost of $4995.50 and the annual operating cost of $4025.91 <br />Cons: City would lose the ability to track/ collect real time information on equipment use <br />Alternative #2 Install AVL software on large, main route, snow removal equipment and sidewalk clearing unit <br />(recommend) <br />Pros: Would give the PW department the ability to track real time use of equipment during plowing events and <br />collect data on location, material use, percentage of route completion and any streets that way have been missed in <br />the plowing operation. The information collected is also useful in tort claims and citizen complaints. The AVL <br />equipment would be transferred to vehicles used in summer maintenance activities after the snow season ended. <br />Cons: The initial hardware cost of $4996 and the annual operating cost of $4026, however, these costs would be <br />recovered over time with operational savings. <br />Funding Source: <br />General Fund cost center 0312-6580 <br />This purchase was funded in the 2013 general fund budget at $15,000.00 <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />