My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/04/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/04/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:17:50 AM
Creation date
4/1/2013 8:35:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/04/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 10, 2013 I Volume 7 I Issue 3 Zoning Bulletin <br />Case Note: <br />HSG had also alleged that the County's zoning decision constituted a taking of HSG's <br />property. The court rejected these allegations, finding that HSG did not have the neces- <br />sary element of a constitutionally protected property interest in its right to apply for a <br />mining permit or permit amendment because DEQ retained discretion as to permit <br />issuance. <br />Zoning News from Around the Nation <br />MASSACHUSETTS <br />Multiple communities have requested, by letters to the governor and other <br />state representatives, a delay in the implementation of the Commonwealth's new <br />medical marijuana law, "until proper rules and regulations have been set forth by <br />the Department of Public Health (DPH)." Under the new law, "standards and <br />regulations must be adopted through the DPH within 120 days" from when the <br />law went into effect —which was January 1, 2013. The municipalities contend <br />that without a delay in implementation of the new law, they would be obligated <br />to "manage the medical marijuana dispensary process for four months without <br />any guidance from the state." <br />Source: Tri -Town Transcript; www.wickedlocal.com <br />NEW HAMPSHIRE <br />State Representative, Katherine Rogers, reportedly plans to introduce "a bill <br />for next year that would require projects by the state and other governments, <br />such as cities and school districts, to conform to Local land -use rules." Currently, <br />under state law, "projects don't need to comply with local land -use rules as long <br />as they represent a `governmental use' by the state or a city, town, county, school <br />district, public university, community college or village district. Projects that <br />aren't a governmental use but are located on public land don't enjoy that <br />exemption." <br />Source: Concord Monitor; www.concordmonitor.com <br />NEW JERSEY <br />State Assemblyman Peter Barnes reportedly plans to introduce a bill that <br />would establish a state agency charged with assuming much of the authority for <br />rebuilding shore towns battered by super -storm Sandy. Such an agency would <br />purportedly "take over planning and zoning for all coastal communities, render- <br />ing their own planning and zoning boards moot." Local officials are concerned <br />that such a commission would usurp the power of local officials, and "add an- <br />other layer of bureaucracy and compliance on top of existing rules, regulations <br />and compliance standards." <br />Source: NJ.com; www.nj.com <br />12 © 2013 Thomson Reuters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.