My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/04/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/04/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:17:50 AM
Creation date
4/1/2013 8:35:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/04/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recently, Staff met with the Subject Property owner again regarding this site. The Subject Property owner <br />informed Staff that the indoor shooting range proposal was no longer moving forward on the Subject Property. It is <br />Staffs understanding that Total Defense is pursuing other options in an employment district that permits indoor <br />commercial recreation. The Subject Property owner again suggested that the warehousing /recycling user be <br />considered and reiterated that it is their opinion that retail isn't working in this area. Staff had recommended that the <br />Subject Property owner contact the parcel owners to the east and west of the Subject Property to discuss their <br />thoughts on what could be done to improve the success of the retail node. Staff feels that a broader approach is <br />necessary, rather than focusing on individual parcels. <br />Funding Source: <br />This update is being handled as part of Staffs regular duties. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />This retail node has been identified by both the Planning Commission and EDA as a priority area. Staff will be <br />bringing forward this same information to the EDA at their April meeting as well. It is Staffs opinion that both the <br />Planning Commission and the EDA were clear that there was no desire to see the land use in this area change to an <br />employment type of district. At this point, the logical next steps may be to consider other land uses that are <br />compatible with the long term vision of the area as well as the surrounding area. Other variables to consider include <br />analyzing the cost of certain infrastructure components (utilities), and what financing tools may be available. Staff <br />recommends that the Planning Commission await direction of the EDA as it relates to their Work Plan component <br />for the 1 67th Avenue Retail Node. <br />Action: <br />There is no specific action required at this time, this is for informational and discussion purposes only. <br />Site Location Map <br />January 31, 2013 Planning Commission Case <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill (Originator) Tim Gladhill 03/29/2013 08:10 AM <br />Tim Gladhill (Originator) Tim Gladhill 03/29/2013 08:10 AM <br />Form Started By: Tim Gladhill Started On: 03/21/2013 01:42 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 03/29/2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.