Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />See Section V -C, standards of <br />reviewing zoning <br />applications limits on city <br />discretion. <br />Minn Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />6. <br />Sunrise Lake Ass 'n v. <br />Chisago County Bd. of <br />Comm 'rs, 633 N.W.2d 59 <br />(Minn Ct App.2001). <br />See Section V- C -3 -d, <br />requests for variances from <br />the zoning ordinance. <br />Amoco Oil Co. v. City of <br />Minneapolis, 395 N.W.2d <br />115 (Minn. Ct. App.,1986). <br />Zylka v. City of Crystal, 167 <br />N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 1969). <br />See Sample resolution <br />granting a CUP. <br />See Sample resolution <br />denying a CUP. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.3595. <br />Zylka v. City of Crystal, 167 <br />N.W.2d 45, (Minn. 1969). <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.3595. <br />Minn Stat. § 462.3595, subd. <br />2. <br />Schwardt v. County of <br />Watonwan, 656 N.W.2d 383 <br />(Minn. 2003). <br />Yang v. County of Carver, <br />660 N.W.2d 828 (Minn. Ct. <br />App. 2003). <br />Citizens for a Balanced City <br />v. Plymouth Congregational <br />Church, 672 N.W.2d 13 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2003). <br />Trisko v. City of Waite Park, <br />566 N.W.2d 349 (Minn. Ct. <br />App. 1997). <br />b) Prohibited uses <br />Cities may receive applications requesting permission to engage in uses <br />explicitly prohibited under the city's zoning ordinance. For example, a <br />request to engage in industrial activities in a commercial zone. When a use is <br />prohibited, the city cannot allow the use unless an amendment to the city's <br />zoning ordinance is adopted in accordance with the procedures of the <br />Municipal Planning Act. Cities are prohibited from granting variances or <br />conditional use permits to engage in prohibited uses. <br />c) Conditional use permits <br />The concept of a conditional use permit (CUP) was created to give cities <br />more flexibility in zoning ordinance administration. Generally, conditional <br />uses are uses that are often too problematic to be permitted uses as of rigjht <br />in a district. However, since the use is still generally favorable or necessary, <br />outright prohibition of the use is generally not practical or desired. A classic <br />example of such a mixed positive /negative use is a gas station in a <br />residential area. Conditional uses seek to strike a middle ground between <br />outright, unchecked permissive establishment and complete prohibition. <br />Conditional uses are uses that will be allowed if certain conditions (that <br />minimize the problematic features of the use) are met. <br />Cities must specify conditional uses in a city ordinance. Generally, a list of <br />conditional uses will be found alongside the permitted uses in a city <br />ordinance. The ordinance must also establish what conditions or standards <br />must be met to allow the conditional use. Ordinances that fail to establish <br />standards for granting the listed conditional uses are problematic and <br />potentially invalid. <br />The city must grant the CUP if the applicant satisfies all the conditions <br />established in the ordinance. <br />A city may deny a CUP if the proposed use: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 9/10/2012 <br />Zoning Guide for Cities Page 31 <br />