My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/04/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/04/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:17:50 AM
Creation date
4/1/2013 8:35:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/04/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />l e. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />le (c). <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. <br />If. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357 subd. <br />le(2). <br />While legal nonconformities must be allowed to continue, a zoning <br />ordinance may prohibit them from being expanded, extended or rebuilt in <br />certain situations. However, nonconformities, including the lawful use or <br />occupation of land or premises existing at the time of an amendment to the <br />zoning ordinance, may be continued through repair, replacement, <br />restoration, maintenance, improvement, but not including expansion, unless: <br />• The nonconformity or occupancy is not used for a period of more than <br />one year. <br />• Any nonconforming use is destroyed by fire or other peril to the extent <br />of greater than 50 percent of its estimated market value, as indicated in <br />the records of the county assessor at the time of damage, and no building <br />permit has been applied for within 180 days of when the property is <br />damaged. In this case a municipality may impose reasonable conditions <br />upon a building permit in order to mitigate any newly created impact on <br />adjacent property or bodies of water. <br />Cities can also regulate nonconforming uses and structures to maintain <br />eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. State law specifically <br />authorizes city regulation of nonconforming uses to mitigate potential flood <br />damage or flood flow. <br />Any subsequent use or occupancy of the land or premises shall be a <br />conforming use or occupancy. <br />2. Shoreland legal nonconformities <br />a) All shoreland Tots <br />When a nonconforming structure in a shoreland district, as defined by local <br />ordinance, with less than 50 percent of the required setback from the water, <br />is destroyed by fire or other peril to greater than 50 percent of its estimated <br />market value, as indicated in the records of the county assessor at the time of <br />damage, the structure setback may be increased by the city if practicable and <br />reasonable conditions may be placed upon a zoning or building permit to <br />mitigate created impacts on the adjacent property or water body. <br />In addition, nonconforming shoreland lots of record in the office of the <br />county recorder, on the date of adoption of local shoreland controls that do <br />not meet the requirements for lot size or lot width have additional state law <br />protections. <br />The city may (but is not required to) allow this type of lot to be used as a <br />building site if: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 9/10/2012 <br />Zoning Guide for Cities Page 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.