My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/09/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 04/09/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:12:43 AM
Creation date
4/18/2013 9:19:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/09/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers Tossey, Kuzma, Elvig, <br />LeTourneau, and Riley. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Backous. <br />The City Council meeting moved into a Closed Session at 5:54 p.m. <br />The City Council reconvened in Open Session at 6:23 p.m. <br />It was noted the Council held discussion and authorized staff to further negotiations. <br />2.02: 15153 Nowthen Boulevard: Review Cost Benefit Analysis of Former Municipal <br />Center Site <br />Management Analyst Brama reviewed the staff report. <br />Councilmember Elvig noted in the past, this property was sought after for high -density housing <br />and questioned if there was appetite for that option. He stated there could be $100,000 to <br />$120,000 per acre for this 20-acre site. <br />Management Analyst Brama stated a high -density housing analysis was not included, but could <br />be conducted. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill stated staff has looked at medium- to high -density <br />residential previously but the Council's appetite was lukewarm unless a senior housing project. <br />Because of that, staff did not invest additional resources in undertaking that analysis. <br />Councilmember Elvig agreed it may not be the right timing to consider residential but he wanted <br />to raise that option since there was market interest at one time, noting there is also a school <br />across the street. <br />Management Analyst Brama presented staff's analysis of potential revenues, expenses, and one- <br />time land transaction. He reviewed an updated bond analysis, preliminary analysis for Fire <br />Station funding, and next steps. <br />It was noted that staff reviewed the cost/benefit analysis and reached the following conclusions: <br />1) From a one-time land transaction scenario perspective, a residential development <br />scenario results in a higher general tax revenue stream than does a residential <br />development. 1 Data Center = $276,742; 2 Data Centers = $223,714; and, Residential = <br />$28,263. <br />2) From a one-time land transaction scenario perspective, a residential development <br />scenario results in a higher return for the City. Data Centers — 0 - $500,000; Residential <br />= $1,000,000. <br />3) Considering the City's strategic plan of using revenues from the Subject Property to pay <br />for a new fire station, Staff would conclude Data Center scenarios provide a stronger and <br />more complete financial solution than does a residential development. <br />City Council Work Session / March 12, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.