My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
07/10/89
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
07/10/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 8:56:26 AM
Creation date
11/14/2003 3:02:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
07/10/1989
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion by Acting Chairman Hetland and seconded by Commissioner Prall to recommend that park <br />dedication be satisfied by land as stated in the landsca;)e architect's review of June :. 1929 and <br />wilh a 35 loot easement alon.o the soulhern end of the property with the possible exchange of <br />property. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: /,cling Chairman Hefland, Commissioners Lokke;. Prall and <br />Johnson. Voling No: None. Absent: Commissioners Rustad and Shumway. <br /> <br />.Case ~'3 Review of Draft Sidewalk and Trailway Ordinance <br /> <br />Merland Otto reviewed the proposed sidewalk and Irailway ordinance wilh the Commission. He <br />told the Commission that they have to decide what is a sidewalk and what is a trailway. If a <br />sidewalk goes. into a development the developer should not get credit for park dedic&tion due to <br />the facl lhal under the subdivision ordinance the City has the right to tell a developer where <br />lhoy want a sidewalk. <br /> <br />Acting Chairman Hetland asked what the purpose of the sidewalk and trailway ordinance was. <br /> <br />Merland Otto told him that it is tO clarify thai sidewalks are not part of park dedication and also <br />to deter pedestrian traffic on the roads. <br /> <br />Acting Chairman Hetland asked if the ordinanc~ they were reviewing was enforceable as it reads. <br /> <br />Merland Otto told lhe Commission that the ordinance in the agenda is almost work verbatim with <br />the ordinance in Champlin. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lokker expressed his feelings that this issue should go to the City Council. <br /> <br />Merland Otto told him that he wants to get some input from the Park and Recreation Commission <br />as well as the Planning and Zoning Commissior~ before taking the sidewalk and trailway <br />ordinance to th6 City Council. <br /> <br />Case ~4 Development of Tot Lot/Playground at River's Bend Park <br /> <br />Merland Otto asked the Commission to look at some of the park equipment cataiogs he brought and <br />to decide which pieces they would like for each park. <br /> <br />Acting Chairman Hetland recommended that for River's Bend Park the City get set up ¢8746 for <br />$6,600, and for Titterud and Autumn Heights Park they get set up #8742 for $2,200 each, <br />those present agreed. <br /> <br />COMMISSION INPUT <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION/JUNE 8, 1989 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.