My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/23/13
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
04/23/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 11:25:03 AM
Creation date
4/24/2013 12:08:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
04/23/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HRA Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 04/23/2013 <br />By: Jo Thieling, Administrative Services <br />5. 2. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Discuss COR Strategy <br />Background: <br />The COR (previously known as Ramsey Town Center) was purchased by the City HRA in June of 2009. Attached <br />is an exhibit prepared by Landform, the Development Manager at the time, outlining how the City had three <br />development "exit" points in the process. The first exit point was envisioned to be approximately January 2010, <br />where at that time the project would have been re -visioned, a new concept design developed, and the property sold <br />to a large developer. The second exit point was to occur in mid-2011, where at that time it was envisioned "anchor" <br />deals would have been completed and project "entitlements" would have been done (i.e., city and other agency <br />approvals). The third exit point was toward the end of 2012 , where at that time it was envisioned the anchor stores <br />would be complete, infrastructure in place, and lots would be sold to small users. <br />Also attached are the charts showing the proposed costs and revenue projections for the COR tax increment <br />financing district. These exhibits identify some of the key obligations of this development including roads, <br />utilities, and public parking ramps. <br />Notification: <br />None. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />While significant progress was made with the development in several ways, it is safe to say that land sales have <br />been well below what was originally anticipated. The City/HRA have done a number of things to enhance value <br />such as making investments to the road system, adding onto the parking ramp, establishing a new name/brand, <br />signage, creating a tax increment district, platting, zoning and design work. <br />The construction of the rail station has spurred interest, particularly in residential development. When the funding <br />for the Armstrong interchange project is announced, it is anticipated that commercial interest will greatly increase. <br />Strategies: <br />1) Continue as is: This strategy relies upon the fact that the City is hiring an economic development manager, <br />who, along with existing staff could begin marketing this property in a systematic fashion. Evidence indicates that <br />construction activity is starting to increase and the "rooftops" under construction now may drive additional <br />development. If the City is successful in obtaining the Armstrong interchange funding, interest in surrounding land <br />will be high. The rail station impact will also continue to build. A streamlined internal development process also <br />will make it easier to do business in Ramsey. Developers will be required to do individual planning and <br />engineering for each site as part of the sale. <br />2) Broker arrangements: This strategy relies on the land professionals that are in the business to sell land. <br />Typically, they would charge 7% of the land value at closing. The advantage of this approach is that the agent <br />would take care of all the marketing and would get commission at the sale. Land could be sold to either developers <br />and or for speculation, but would likely end up back on the tax roles once sold (unless sold to a tax exempt entity). <br />The HRA can reasonably control who the land is sold to under this strategy, but land could be resold unless the <br />City insisted on development agreements. This strategy could also be implemented on a partial basis. That is, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.